Should we be worried about a 51% attack on BCH? Please elaborate your answer:)
No
Transaction
Hash
78cf4a36e8b802f7270446c8077dd1c842d22e1db0bc2b35a0bd638a0d9be29e
Block
531870
· 2018-05-26 01:57
· 319,091 confirmations
Data
poll-vote
Size
311 bytes
Fee
313 sats (1.00643086 sat/B)
Inputs (1)
Index
0
Previous Output
3045022100f9be5c37854e7658b12e293f912c6c6c97b4017795db2e8e374360f9f67ef5a9022024131ff88f03d25802413ca078ccbcc48dd37e8a0d8e41b292d2e2e193bb785a41 02b33cee4b1f0bed16dd9f436c84c1ffba58155347fa4a156fe985e5ca8ac496b4
Outputs (2)
Index
0
Type
OP_RETURN
OP_RETURN 6d14 479d35637edfc1c03ea7430874023791f0f7c5a5f2290b9ec4b330ab58098e05 4d696e657273272042434820686f6c64696e677320617265206c6172676520656e6f75676820283130306b27732920746f206e6f74206265206f7665726c7920776f72726965642e
Index
1
Spent
OP_DUP OP_HASH160 75230d3ffd6a4ca1391f5e5f518a3f65b6e528d1 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
Raw
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
