Memo - Post by Dark Lord

Dark Lord

replied 2277d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

12dFsg9VhJXeiQ9Z

Not needed: the mempool is less than 8MB at the moment. https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#3,8h

> at the moment

They had their chance several times when the mempool was over 32 MB.

2 / 5

12dFsg9VhJXeiQ9Z

replied 2276d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

True enough. The people pushing 128MB blocks could have at least done it as a symbolic gesture.

John_Doe

replied 2276d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Why would they? They want to use the idea as propaganda.

homopit

replied 2276d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Mempool was not over 32MB - https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#3,2d

Dark Lord

replied 2276d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

@homopit Yes it was. I saw it yesterday on http://bch.btc.com and on my BU node. The mempool on some nodes were bugging (like the one you posted) and didn't show it.

homopit

replied 2276d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Just like that node didn't get >32MB of transactions, it could be that miner's nodes didn't either.