Well, a lot of these projects work this way. Centralized at first to decentralize later.
What steps does EOS plan to take in order to become decentralized? I know that, for example, IOTA is preparing to remove the Coordinator. I don't know what is required of EOS.
EOS community is all built by developers. BM is also genius w a lot of reputation. Seems like they did everything right and the scale of the project is massive.
The problem I have with them is they, from what I've seen, actively reject "code is law" for a more manual approach. They act like a bank and don't seem to want it any other way.
What are the reasons for that you think?
Tell me more about IOTA? Im not familiar.
Instead of processing TXs over the distributed tangle, all TXs currently go through a central Coordinator for processing. IOTA won't be decentralized until this Coordinator is removed.
How did they build their communities?
I have to admit that I'm not quite certain. I got into the project a little later than many other investors.
I'm interested in understanding how they drive adoption. This should be on everyone's mind basically.
You can check out their Dev portal here:
Personally, I got interested in the project after hearing many consecutive partnerships with reputable companies such as Bosche. I imagine many others got invovled this way.
