Create account

replied 2199d
TrashPosterInTheDark
I have looked at some, and they are not the same, and have a huge spread as to when they happened. I once read a biblical flood apologist book. Really stupid stuff in there.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2199d
replied 2199d
Talkorogins... lol. I prefer valid sources of information. Religious sources of information are no good for figuring out how thigs work.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2198d
They don't talk about religion you moron. And I'm still waiting for an answer.
replied 2198d
Thru are a Christian propaganda group. One of the worst garbage sites out there.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
BTW even if it's garbage Christian propaganda group which account exactly isn't real? Seriously at this point you just sound retarded and completely lack of argument.
replied 2197d
Most Christians accounts of history are not real. The most they get right is that cities existed. They are not actually history. They are stories meant to teach a lesson.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
And what about the Wikipedia article? Is that too much facts for your little brain to process so you had to dissmiss it?
replied 2197d
Actually if you actually read those myths you see how they are far to spread out in time to be talking about the same event. Your own link defeats your argument.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
Which one? Because the majority talks about a global wiping flood. Obviously you haven't read them.
replied 2197d
At very different times, and with a limited understanding of what the entire world was.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
Exactly. Interesting isn't it?
replied 2197d
Not really. Rather trivial, and doesnt lead to any interesting conclusions.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2193d
Unless you start using your brain.
replied 2193d
That is how you see it doesnt support these wild conclusions.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
Still waiting for an answer.
replied 2197d
I did answer actually. When you asked "what about these" I told you the source was garbage.