Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
http://adsbit.harvard.edu//full/1928ApJ....68..341M/0000341.000.html TL;DR there's plenty of fringe shift, just not in the amounts or direction anybody expected/predicted.
2 / 25
replied 2834d
These experiments all had non-zero measurements, they were just all below the resolution of the experimental set up.
replied 2834d
“not in amounts or direction expected” = null hypothesis. just because something is measured does not mean it is a signal.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
Read, there's a new hypothesis in there. http://adsbit.harvard.edu//full/1928ApJ....68..341M/0000341.000.html
replied 2834d
not reading 49 pages. don't even care if the earth is flat or round or resting on turtles. don't care if cold fusion works or is fusion at all. when I have free electricity I'll care.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
Care if billions are being wasted on hot fusion when there's a simple, decentralized alternative? Maybe that's why it gets no attention or funding and ppl associate it with flat earth?
replied 2832d
If its so simple and decentralized why not just build it? What satoshi did. You think anyone would refuse cheaper energy?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2832d
Some folks here seem to be working on it https://www.teamscotia.com
replied 2832d
cool, hope it works. this is an issue with having state funded science. range of topics allowed is limited.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2832d
I think the energy industry(oil and "green") is a lot like the pharmaceutical industry(and the banking industry). A monopoly fueled by public subsidy.
replied 2832d
Why not make decentralized energy production devices for places that need it most (e.g. remote)?
replied 2832d
Energy, pharma & banking have many favorable laws that prop up their monopolies. Doesn’t stop decentralized solutions (see BCH). Also doesn’t stop international efforts.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2832d
BCH is a tiny drop in the bucket of world finance. I'd say it's smaller proportionally than cold fusion reaserch.
replied 2832d
doesn't matter how small it is now (e.g. internet). important part is different solutions can be tried.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2832d
I mean both projects are under heavy attack. Natural/alt medicine is under constant CDC/MSM propaganda attack. They freaking killed Tesla.
replied 2829d
Turns out its from the innovators dilemma. Basically, the new tech slowly eats away at entrenched market interested until they take over the market.
1
replied 2829d
IIRC the gist is that established companies dont know where to focus their research money. (eg which crypto currency to develop for)
replied 2829d
Would have to think the same thing would happen with BCH/banks or fiat.
replied 2829d
sorry this took forever to respond to. I very vaguely remembered this story about steel mills being disrupted but couldn’t remember where it was from
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
It matters because if reletivity is true it should be a solid zero in every direction with no variation. This guy took readings by hand while walking hundreds of miles in a circle.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
If you doubt it but don't know the particulars of how the experiment works that's willful ignorance on your part. Same as just taking Core talking points at face value. Read the paper.
replied 2834d
k
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
Here's another guy that's worked his butt off to prove a non-mainstream theory. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CiNDqaFPO4A
replied 2834d
ok, great. washing machines work hard too.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2834d
This is proof of work. You wouldn't slave away for thirty years if you weren't onto something. These guys are ignored because their discoveries are disruptive.
replied 2832d
Yes but proof of work isn’t proof the work is true. I’m sure perpetual motion researchers work hard to. Religious figures work hard. Bigfoot and ghost researchers work hard.


About Privacy Terms Stats