BSV have said that reorgs are a feature not a bug before.
It just needed saying again because of the exposure.
Plus some interesting details, in your cited article, as for tx order.
Hi! Thanks for the link, I haven't been on yours in a while. It's actually cleaned itself up a bit since I last remember.
While I totally see what you mean (CSW being kicked off Twitter is actually good, Being delisted is actually good, etc), I do think reorgs being a feature is consistent with what BSV has been saying all along.
Consider the following. These are things BSV has been saying all along.
1. propagation and orphan blocks are not a problem - they incentivize miners to compete and invest in the network.
2. no double spends occurred () and only miners were affected.
3. we know from stress tests in the pre-hash war days that every mining pool had differential capacity to handle big blocks.
The alternative seems to be top-down blocksize maximums and small block subsidies.
