This is how science works. When you get a negative result it means your hypothesis was incorrect. You dont assume you hypothesis to be correct because it’s what you first ‘believed’.
“Many experimental results never see the light of publication day... it comes down to the data being “negative”, i.e. the expected and/or wanted effect was not observed.”
umm..? all have null results w/ the fringe shift detected <= the resolution of the experimental set up & expected (hypothesized) shift >> than measured.
From page 354 "It was zero in so far as the motion of the earth in its orbit is concerned. The remaining effect, however, was large enough to be measured"
Absolutely not. Flat earthers like to cite the Michelson Morley experement but the detailed results agree with their conclusion. They also don't agree with Einstein.
You shouldn't block flat earthers for the simple fact that it's a fun thought experiment finding every-day observable proofs that the earth is round. Good logic exercise.
hypothesis was if there is an aether & the earth is moving then there will be fringe shifts. didn't see fringe shift = hypothesis was incorrect. this is called a negative result.
not reading 49 pages. don't even care if the earth is flat or round or resting on turtles. don't care if cold fusion works or is fusion at all. when I have free electricity I'll care.
Care if billions are being wasted on hot fusion when there's a simple, decentralized alternative? Maybe that's why it gets no attention or funding and ppl associate it with flat earth?
Energy, pharma & banking have many favorable laws that prop up their monopolies. Doesn’t stop decentralized solutions (see BCH). Also doesn’t stop international efforts.
It matters because if reletivity is true it should be a solid zero in every direction with no variation. This guy took readings by hand while walking hundreds of miles in a circle.
If you doubt it but don't know the particulars of how the experiment works that's willful ignorance on your part. Same as just taking Core talking points at face value. Read the paper.
This is proof of work. You wouldn't slave away for thirty years if you weren't onto something. These guys are ignored because their discoveries are disruptive.
Yes but proof of work isn’t proof the work is true. I’m sure perpetual motion researchers work hard to. Religious figures work hard. Bigfoot and ghost researchers work hard.