Create account

2848d · The-One-Law
Okay, just feeling out your position. Of course NAP produces the same results so I agree with all of them, just seemed like your definition of "harm" would fail to protect property.
3 / 6 1
640
replied 2847d
Property is the physical extent of Being, acquired by transaction, agreement or otherwise not Harming others.
http://archive.fo/KNCUo illustrates how 'States' obfuscate sovereignty.
replied 2847d
Sounds like you're stretching a bit to include property as part of a person's "being", whatever that means, just so you can ban violence and theft under one principle.
replied 2843d
"...property as part of a person's "being", whatever that means..." informs me to find some way to describe this more fully.
replied 2847d
I'd say it's the other way around: if your body is your property all you need are property rights: don't hit my face, don't hit my car.
replied 2847d
Thank you for asking - it gave me a good reason to elaborate.
Defining "Property" is part of how The-One-Law arose originally.
States legalize theft of property and freedom.
replied 2847d
Property is the physical extent of Being, acquired by transaction, agreement or otherwise not Harming others. http://archive.fo/KNCUo illustrates how 'States' obfuscate sovereignty.


About Privacy Terms Stats