Create account

lup
2464d
If the Earth isn't flat, then why does all the real evidence indicate a motionless Flat Earth while all the fake NASA CGI/Photoshop evidence show a globe?
replied 2464d
So what we have on the othe side of fucking flat earth?
John_Doe
replied 2464d
Don't expect a response. They are like an insane person sticking crap in his ears muttering out loud. Just ignore.
lup
replied 2464d
nobody knows. I don't believe in vacuum space. earth is just a flat superfice and Antarctica are the circular limits. research the model on internet
En Fri Mand
replied 2464d
I have thought the same. I have become open to the possibility that the earth could indeed be flat.
En Fri Mand
replied 2464d
It simply makes more sense, that it's flat.
replied 2464d
Another proof is the code of Stellarium, It uses the globe model to calculate the position of every object on the sky at any time, from any place. https://github.com/Stellarium
replied 2464d
you only need to see the moves of stars at night to realize that the spinning axis' angle is exactly the same as your latitude. Very easy proof of round earth.
mnice
replied 2464d
How can the constellations remain the same year after year, particularly the North Star, when the earth is a rock hurting through space. Should we not see different stars every night?
replied 2464d
The north star changes, vega or thaneb were north stars thousands of years ago. You can do a simulation on Stellarium. I'm not an expert though, Better ask it in an Astronomy Forum.
mnice
replied 2464d
It doesn't make sense how the stars have stayed the same since recorded history. They would have to change in globe earth flying through space. Should see different ones every night
replied 2464d
they due change as measured in precession.
globe flying through space? stars seem to follow their own orbits the same, to me at least.
thanks for the BCH contribution anyhow.
mnice
replied 2464d
Yes rock flying through space. That's the actual model. And what about Halley's Comet? How can a comet ever be seen more than once? Wouldn't it just fly by and never be seen again?
replied 2463d
Wikipedia has the answer to your question about Halley's Comet:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halley's_Comet#Computation_of_orbit
mnice
replied 2463d
Still doesn't make sense how a comet could hold together for thousands of years flying at hundreds of thousands miles an hour. Would fall apart in space before returning to earth
replied 2463d
It does make sense as long as Halley's computation is reproducible and predicts quite well the comet's period. Why don't you show your computation to prove your hypothesis?
replied 2463d
You can also simulate this on Stellarium by activating constellation names, Choose midnight time, and increase days one by one.
replied 2463d
We do see different stars every night. Every month the main constellation (the one you see when you look to the south) changes. That was indeed the source of horoscope.
mnice
replied 2463d
Right but they are the same pattern year after year and N star is same. If we were flying through space on a rock we would see different constellations and never the same one twice.
replied 2463d
Compared to some stars the sun moves at a blisteringly slow 20 km/s. With the least distance between stars being ~4.8 or so light years the difference in constellations, particularly
replied 2463d
those over 50-100 ly out, constellations could have no perceptible change over tens of thousands of years at least.
mnice
replied 2460d
The science community realized this flaw to the globe model and the only solution was to claim the stars are light years away. It's made up BS to keep the theory alive
replied 2460d
Smurf community realized that by sending nonsense posts about Flat Earth can keep the humans busy. Flat Earth is made up BS by smurfs like you to fool humans.
mnice
replied 2460d
Next time you're outside ask yourself if the sun looks like it's 93,000,000 miles away or if it's close and local. The answer is obvious
replied 2459d
I'm too busy looking for you, little bothering Smurfs. I don't have time to make very basic calculations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_diameter
mnice
replied 2459d
There's no calculations to make. Just look at the sun. It's so obviously not 93,000,000 miles away I find it amazing anyone ever bought that as reality.
replied 2459d
If you look at it in a logical and analytical way you can realize how far it is. If your thought is guided by faith and prejudice, then you still live in dark middle ages.
Raineko
replied 2460d
The sun is obviously not close and local because over the course of the day it doesn't change in angular size, also it goes down the horizon and disappears from view.
replied 2463d
I'm not an expert, but my intuation says that the stars are so far away that in practice it is like the solar system were inside another sphere where the distant stars are projected.
OnePieceOG
replied 2464d
It’s because we are in a simulation, we think things are authentic when really they are not.
taowanzou
replied 2463d
The North Star changes due to [axial precession](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_precession). The full cycle is ~25,772 years
lup
replied 2464d
congratulations. you brake the more difficult barrier. now you can research a lot of things to find out what looks more like truth. stay flat ,,❌🌎❌
John_Doe
replied 2464d
How do you explain the time difference between countries our the seasons between the northern and southern hemispheres. Please don't add a video out you don't know. Just say so.
lup
replied 2464d
sun is local and small and move around the superfice. in winter of north hemisphere it is on capricorn tropic. then it move to cancer tropic on summer.is easier to undertand with a vid
replied 2464d
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2464d
Special reletivity is a bandaid on the theory that earth is "moving" "through" space. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2464d
Flat earth is the PR cover-up for this little whoopsies.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2464d
But wouldn't that mean that the outer galaxies are "moving" faster than the speed of light? Yup, they are. But they're not. But they are.

Don't get me started on quantum physics.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2464d
If you understand reletivity(and why the theory exists) you'd realize it's just as valid to say the sun and planets(universe!) revolve around the earth.
John_Doe
replied 2464d
At least spell relativity correctly. Otherwise people might think you haven't done any research on the topic.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2464d
I been in Japan too long >_<