Create account

Mrpumperitis
replied 2143d
Sk8eM dUb
Coins without leaders will struggle to be used by B&G, the coins need B&G but
Banks, and Gov need crypto that has a phone helpline and devs you can work with, like VB or David S
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2143d
What it needs to become is rock solid. There's no need for a help line if you know that tomorrow it'll be the same as today. That's why the ABC progressive agenda doesn't work.
Mrpumperitis
replied 2143d
Banks that work with xrp have direct contact with dev team.
All stablecoin creators on eth wil have contact wit eth team.
I dont see csw doing that, he just says fuck al the time lol.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2143d
You're not understanding me. ABC wants to be THE permenant go-to dev team like you're saying. But if they are, that means BCH is no better than BTC.
Barricade
replied 2143d
There's one easy way to avoid that: use other clients like BU, XT, bcash... But it's a miner choice. I guess BU will gain more weight in the network.
Mrpumperitis
replied 2143d
lols, ur right im not and same for you to me.
I dont want either abc,csw, the banks or gov on BCH
B&G can use eth,xrp or others..
Long term BCH real Bitcoin will unbank the banked.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2143d
You should want banks to use Bitcoin. It prevents them from doing fractional reserve lending. It's like having bank vaults with glass walls so you can see if your money is still there.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2143d
If a decently oil/mineral rich country decides to adopt a real sound money like BCH, the federal reserve will sick their dogs on them so quickly your head will spin.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2143d
The BCH base layer needs to be elemental, like gold. Everybody knows what it is and knows how to tell if it's genuine. It'll still be the exact gold tomorrow that it was yesterday.