Create account

Nikamoto
replied 2191d
Bitcoin is not checkpoints indeed
replied 2191d
Bitcoin is a PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH SYSTEM AS DESCRIBED IN THE SATOSHI WHITE PAPER. The Satoshi White paper itself is not the definition of bitcoin.
replied 2191d
the Satoshi White Paper can become outdated just as the U.S constitution is outdated.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2190d
Ouch, you just outted yourself. Man you're stupid.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2190d
He outed himself a long time ago. As soon as theres a mute function he'll be the first to go. I can learn from ppl with differing opinions but this guy is dumber than a post.
replied 2190d
No you are just a Moron who pushes FUD daily. Go back to your rabbit hole.
replied 2190d
Please read the white paper its a quick read! https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Bunch
replied 2191d
Maybe some technical mechanisms in the WP will become outdated, but never the spirit of it. Following that spirit led to splitting from BTC and now, for most, rejecting SV
replied 2191d
If that didn't happen there wouldn't even be the need for LN
replied 2191d
The only reason there even was a BCH is because BTC no longer was a peer to peer cash system because fees went thorough the roof. Otherwise the Sh*t they added didn't matter.
Nikamoto
replied 2191d
So what ? You are telling me "CSW has haspower and I think he is a bad guy so Bitcoin needs to change from PoW and become Ripple" ? I'm not ok with that
Nikamoto
replied 2191d
So if you want changes don't push them when it's controversial. Even banks aren't doing that with the fiat I have in my pocket. It's my stuff you are not allowed to change it
replied 2191d
The public only cares if transactions are fast cheap and reliable. As long as BCH continues to be that, nobody is going to switch over to SV.
replied 2191d
Well you can do whatever you want. BCH still fits the definition of bitcoin. So is SV. As far as money, the public doesn't give a rats butt about the technology.