You believe it is exaggerated. If the company gives too much money to someone, another company can do the job better, therefore cheaper, and win contracts. Another marketplace
But now that we have established that there is at least some work, we can go to the next step. Someone has to do that work, why don't you explain your model for how this can be done
How can anyone warrant that owner of business with few 1000 people, capitalists that don't even work there, can get billions in profits? HOW? What logic? Do you get it now?
Your tone is getting annoying. Yes, there are problems in the world. No, you have not shown that your alternative that you refuse to tell me about will give better results.
Yes, if capitalist does do SOME work, they should be rewarded for that work ONLY & not more, Capitalism rewards them way more then they deserve, that is the whole point.
Come on man, ALL WORK and skills are NEEDED, management is just one of them & OWNING IS NEITHER A SKILL OR WORK, so there should be no people having absurdly large amounts of $ at all.
About large amounts of money to some, my understanding is that this is a result of Pareto distribution,which is hard to fight, unless you compare to a ideal that you refuse to describe
So now we have moved from management to ownership. Owning may take skill/work. You can buy/sell shares in a company based on your predictions.This has value beyond what the owner skims