Create account

replied 2256d
TrashPosterInTheDark
You don't need to eat animals to satisfy your hunger. You might need to satisfy a habit, perhaps, but habits can and should be changed when it becomes known that they are destructive.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2256d
Eating plants also destroys them so the argument don't really stand. Humans are meant to eat meat just as the same wolves are meant doing so.
replied 2256d
Plants are not sentient. What do you mean by "meant"?
replied 2251d
Not that we know of now, but that can change in the future, plats may be sentient (I do not think so personally) but I am open for the possibility.
replied 2251d
Sure, but we can only work within known science. All sorts of things that we haven't figured out yet can potentially be true, but taking such unknowns into account would be irrational.
replied 2251d
We need to take the fact that we do not know into account at least. Just as it was not uncommon to view animals as non-sentient for sure in the past. We have no way of actually ->
replied 2251d
-> measuring sentience, but we infer the likelihood from comparing the biology of humans and animals. But yeah, we have no clue about how consciousness works.
replied 2251d
We can acknowledge the fact that we don't know everything, but we can't act based on things we don't know. Science or even doing anything rational would be impossible under such logic.
replied 2251d
Science is a method that works great in some fields of life, but what gets funded, prioritized and is used as argumentation in human affairs are also subject to politics and economics.
replied 2251d
Science isn't perfect, I agree.
replied 2250d
The great thing with science (Scientific Method) over time is that it can only get better results over time, the special part is that it updates and discards mistakes systematically.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2256d
I mean biologically aligned. I am a biological machine that can process meat to survive, just as wolves.
replied 2256d
You can, sort of, but you'll survive longer on plants.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2256d
I agree but not because of the meat itself but because of all the chemical crap they put in it.
replied 2256d
No, it's the meat itself too.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2256d
Well this is yet to be proven which would be very a hard thing to. Either positively and negatively.
replied 2255d
replied 2255d
I try not to believe everything Google says. After all, it is a marketing company.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2255d
Yeah and they are recycling themselves in the propaganda businesses.
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2254d
The removed "Don't be Evil" and leaked horryfying "Google Ledger". Just a bunch of globalists
replied 2255d
Dr. Greger doesn't work for Google. He has his own project at nutritionfacts.org.
replied 2255d
I have no idea who he works for. The point is that is a google logo on the video right?
replied 2255d
Who cares what logo there is? The scientific data on nutrition and disease in the presentation is the point. Are you rejecting it because you don't like Google?
replied 2255d
You do know that google's main business is stealing your private data and selling at auction right?
replied 2255d
I don't give a fuck about Google in this context. Google is utterly irrelevant to this discussion. The topic is health, nutrition, plant based foods, veganism.
replied 2255d
I just don't trust google.
replied 2251d
You should hear their new motto: Don't distrust us (we are not evil).
replied 2251d
Actually, google is evil. As a Search Engine Optimization expert, I know that for FACT.
replied 2251d
They are the good kind of evil though.
replied 2251d
google is part of the deep state.