Create account

replied 2006d
And that is exactly what is wrong with it because you are selling your effort/work/labor/energy for LESS then what you deserve, because the capitalist who did no work wants to exploit.
replied 2006d
The capitalist either did work,or did invest, and that investment is just as important as the labour, and sometimes more important.
replied 2006d
You are truly very ignorant. Investment is NOT WORK, get that into your thick head and money alone produces NOTHING and WORK ONLY PRODUCES EVERYTHING.
replied 2006d
Investment > work. Labour without the right tools doesnt accomplish much. Investment brings the right tools. Work alone accomplishes very little.
replied 2006d
No it is not you stupid moron, you are really talking out of your ass, what did people do when there was no money? Can you build a house if you had no money? Of course you can.
replied 2006d
You can build a house without money, but you can build a house a lot faster and easier by buying better equipment. A back hoe can dig more than guys with shovels.
replied 2006d
So you admit that you are wrong? Money doesn't create anything, money is mad mane concept, it is just UNIT of exchange, measurement of value just how SI units are measures of something
replied 2006d
I admit I showed you were wrong. Investment gets a lot more done than work alone, and I explained that. Investment decreases the amount of work required. Therefore investment > work.
replied 2006d
Sorry... you are stupid as fuck. I think your IQ is less then 80. You can't even understand basic concepts... you are THAT STUPID.
replied 2006d
Funny how when I prove you wrong you just flip your kid. Seems you inwardly admit you were wrong since you are incapable of defending your position.
replied 2006d
WORK is what creates and builds... not money. If you still don't get it and you still think money is what does the work, you are just too stupid so please stop replying to me.
replied 2006d
I guess I just understand construction far better than you. It is pretty obvious you have no experience with these things.
replied 2006d
You stupid moron.... only think you understand is how to write shit.
replied 2006d
I actually have experience in these issues. That is why, unlike you, I know what I am talking about.
replied 2006d
You are by far the most ignorant and quite frankly, highly uneducated person I have talked to, you are completely talking out of your ass & I am tired of trying to make sense into you.
replied 2006d
I actually am educated. I majored in physics and minored in philosophy and political science. Maybe you should spend more time thinking than assuming you are correct.
replied 2006d
That is where you are wrong. The value of your labour is not determined by the price of the product sold.
replied 2006d
The value of labor is in energy needed to produce something. If some worker used all of his energy to produce something, he should get all the rewards.
replied 2006d
Anyone can work hard. Not everyone can work smart. If you are dumb and work hard it doesnt make your labour more valuable. If no one demands your labour it isn't valuable.
replied 2006d
This is about as wrong as it could be. The value of labour is set by supply and demand. If it can be done by anyone then its value is low. If only a few can do it the value is high.