Create account

Justicemate
replied 2252d
It was possible to have many more ancestors in previous implementations of Bitcoin. I wonder if any BCH devs / miners intend to push for a greater number again. I'd welcome it
replied 2252d
Here's a post I put together about it: https://jasonc.me/blog/chained-0-conf-transactions-memo
replied 2252d
"These limits were added unnecessarily" = 👏👏👏👏. Get the crap that forces off chain txns out of our code base.
replied 2252d
This seems like something worthy of the November upgrade.
chalbersma
replied 2252d
In theory this could be distributed outside of the normal upgrade cycle if it's just a node configuration.
replied 2251d
I think you're right. Just a matter of getting enough momentum of miners to change the setting, but it may be good to just remove the setting entirely. It seems "anti-usage".
replied 2251d
It's not trivial, but it's still fairly easy. w/bookchain we split coins into however many utxo is needed. memo could change to switch between 3-4 diff "utxo chains" until nodes supprt
replied 2251d
Edit: Oh wait, you already more or less do that, didn't read the full thread before replying. Should be split automatically though if users are complaining about it.