Capitalism allows you to sell your labour. Communism ties it up with group needs. How do you see Bitcoin as a system that doesn't accept private property rights?
FYI, private property is man made concept which goes completely against natural state of things, only things of personal use should be considered as private property.
That is false. It is a very animal nature to distinguish between mine and yours.
only up to a point of need. Nature has no such thing as over consumption or money, this is what humans introduced only. Animals consume only what they need, not more, humans take more.
If anything humans are the only animal that manages its consumption so as to not over consume. The is what supply and demand regulate. Animals let starvation regulate it.
Again this is wrong. Overconsumption is very natural, from the cellular level up to the animal level. You going to say Australia never saw an animal over consume?
What fucking animal over consumes? Give me one fucking example? What does animal consume? Food & water? Can it eat & drink more then it needs? No. How about land? Also no.
I cant think of an animal that wouldn't over consume. Animals can eat until the food has run out, then they starve and die. Cats do it a lot. Cats put a lot of animals into extinction.
That is not over consumption by an animal, there is a natural balance in nature which is what humans have disturbed. No individual animal over consumers... some people do. You get it?
I get that you have no idea what you are talking about. Animals over consume all the time. Individual animals, and species. Animals can destroy an ecosystem. Look to Australia.
Let me repeat, ONE ANIMAL DOES NOT OVER CONSUME, species as a whole can, but there is NATURAL BALANCE which makes those animals that eat too much, they die out and balance restores.
In nature you have no private property, you have no inheritance, you have no money... you are just too stupid I guess, to understand this.
GPS tracking of wolves in six different packs around Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, which shows how much the wolf packs avoid each other's range
An animals territory is its private property.
You and every moron that liked this post, are just too stupid.
Do you even have a reason to believe that is not the case? You just demand people now to your word? You could try backing up your aim instead of demanding people accept your word.
You have said plenty of really stupid things, therefore you are stupid. And if some person likes such stupid comments, it means they are stupid also. This is basic logic which you lack
I've taken basic logic courses. Have you? Do you really think you have used any logic to come to your conclusions?
I guess it is because I listen to the experts who study animals instead of making bold assumptions as you do.
Animal can fight & need to protect territory (if territorial animal) but it doesn't own it, when it dies that land is used by other animals.
Animal also needs to defend its territory and it can only do so up to a limit, if territory gets too large, it can't be defended by the animal so easy, so there is natural limit there
The limit is irrelevant. It is still the animals territory, and the animal will kill to defend it. So there you go. Natural property.
Limit is very relevant, because its NATURAL LIMIT which again, human's don't "obey" one person having a whole continent is not fucking normal... do you get it yet?
No one person has a continent. Also, who are you to decide it isn't natural?
SILENTSAM.... YOU ARE DUMB AS A FUCK... PLEASE.... STOP REPLYING TO ME AND JUST GO FUCK YOURSELF
If you want an echo-chamber, then Memo is not the right place for you
Quit saying so many incorrect things then. Especially since obvious mistakes.
The British Monarchy colonized Australian continent you stupid fuck... and more than that... is that good enough proof that you are so fucking stupid? Who am I to decide? Who are you?
The British empire was not a single person. Is your mistake obvious yet?
Also, once again, when that animal dies, territory is not inherited or still owned by it. Do you get it yet?
Nothing wrong with inheritance at all. It is actually a good thing.
Again wrong. This is the very thing that allows people who are born into rich families who got rich from exploitation to not having to work at all and continue to exploit others.
Inheritance is earned and deserved. A right worth killing over.
Humans are only species where some human can own whole continent (like the fucking British Monarchy for example), because they exploited & killed other people & stole territories.
No one created any part of this planet or anything within it, which means no one should own any part of the planet, you should own only what you create yourself.
