Create account

BitcoinHoarder
replied 2747d
Does that help to understand the network capacity or does it mean their blocks were irrelevant ? If the latter, that’s disappointing
replied 2746d
Their blocks were completely irrelevant, made of all their own transactions, and put in their own block before propagated to network. This was a CSW trick to make SV look superior.
jim
replied 2746d
CSW trick? Wasn't this a perfect example of PERMISIONLESS block creation? Aren't we all for permisionless or is the narrative about to be skewed by ABCeniles again?
replied 2746d
they are on-edge, feeling dramatic... reality - that block created on a stress-test-day, it helped BU improve 👌👏; CSW just has an alternative to TxBlaster, chill out 💋
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2746d
They did indeed hit the network, which is why so many BU nodes dropped out. In the end, the miners know what is real and what is not and get to decide on the implementation they want
replied 2746d
replied 2746d
What do you mean "their own"? Transactions were propagated to multiple nodes simultaneously from an independent source as far as I read.
replied 2745d
Interesting
replied 2746d
replied 2745d
Those aren't the transactions I was referring to, while they occurred at the same time.
replied 2745d
I showed you evidcnce. Do you have any?
replied 2745d
You did not show me any evidence*.
replied 2745d
Unfollowed.