Create account

Nikamoto
replied 2188d
cbeastsv
Srsly it can't keep going like that for months
The ecosystem is not ready for such hashwars, that's it
Even if in 200days SV has more PoW on it nobody will call that bch ...
En Fri Mand
replied 2187d
1) businesses can't just close down for several months because of waiting for the result of a war. Imagine the Visa network being down for multiple months and businesses ...
En Fri Mand
replied 2187d
2) can't accept any payments in this period. I think Visa would have lost their customers after that.
Nikamoto
replied 2187d
Yup
But in theory everything can go on during this kind of wars, the whole ecosystem and the people are just no ready for such things I think. But in 200years it will be common
replied 2187d
Actually it's better to get the hashwars out now and build a more solid foundation. You Forget BCH has only been around a little over a year. It's still in infancy stage. 👶
I am Satoshi
replied 2187d
What if craig doesn't want to be called BCH, what if his plan is to be called BTC??
Nikamoto
replied 2188d
At this point bch is just becoming a shitcoin. Miners didn't vote, and we have now 2 centralized chains
Even if I like a bit what want to do SV it's just over and Bitcoin(Cash) is dead
I am Satoshi
replied 2187d
Only one coin can be the "Best". We are experimenting with many solutions, and all who held BTC now have BCH and now have BCHSV, we are all fine, lets just see what version is best
replied 2188d
No BCH got rid of the dictating Trash. It's even stronger now.
Nikamoto
replied 2188d
CSW ? Lel
Now it's even more centralized, and it's bch just coz of hired hashrate and community support
Right now bchABC will do whatever they want with that coin
replied 2188d
Why is it more centralized? Because there are less mining pools? Well that would be the same for both sides. But the odds are more mining pools will go towards abc.
Nikamoto
replied 2188d
True both sides are centralized (the SV a bit more I think)
It's not really about the mining pools but "who decide what changes do we do in the code"
replied 2188d
The only reason I care about decentralization is to prevent hacking. I could careless who decides to make changes to the code.
Nikamoto
replied 2187d
The fiat is really hard to hack
En Fri Mand
replied 2187d
except for its owners.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2187d
Ummmmm ya, miners voted. That is exactly what this whole fork debacle has been about. Miners voted & now the community has their say in supporting (holding) what they prefer.
cbeastsv
replied 2188d
Bitcoin is on it's death bed for sure. Bitcoin is supposed to replace war and can't even handle a pillow fight without exchanges interfering.
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2187d
Bitcoin survived Blockstream, Bitcoin will survive nChain, Bitcoin is unstoppable
replied 2188d
Bitcoin isn't even finished building yet. It's like saying the Movie Theater is going to go bankrupt before they even put the screens in.
Nikamoto
replied 2188d
So true. Satoshi failed so hard
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2188d
Pandora, however, is LOL.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2188d
Nobody died (AFAIK).