Create account

TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2808d
Don't be so angry.
1 / 90 1
replied 2807d
I do not have any anger but how can I not be sad in this world of liars? I am disappointed & I use my energy to promote the solution to these issues: bitcoin & veganism & shamanism
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
I eat animals with no shame, because animals would eat me with no shame if they were given the opportunity.
1
replied 2807d
Its not about shame its about enlightment. You are missing the positive effects on your physical and mental health which you can not realize with eating "normal" without trying vegan.
1
1,000
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
I was vegan all my childhood. I never noticed any difference since I started eating meat over my physical and mental health.
replied 2807d
You can also smoke tobacco for many years without getting lung problems.
5
2,000
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
Yeah well the difference is that my body is meant to process meat in certain quantity.
3
replied 2807d
You can believe whatever you want or maybe check out "The China Study" and save yourself from future cancer and heart disease.
1
1,000
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
If meat doesn't give me cancer, G5 network will.
2
567
replied 2807d
Thats actually so true. The radiation is a huge problem. My father died from #cancer partially by wifi radiation. Many studies prove radiation causes illness. Julian Assange is next.
1
546
replied 2807d
There are different kinds of radiation. You can get cancer or acute radiation sickness from high doses of ionizing radiation. Wi-Fi, not so much.
replied 2801d
Unless you get the Ionizing Radiation Kind of Wi-Fi - The absolute best.

There were some people working in an old radar station, they got wifi, then later the got cancer:P
replied 2801d
Probably not from the Wi-Fi though...
replied 2801d
You never know! They installed Wi-Fi in a large retirement home, and several of the old people there died the next months. Same with hospitals that got Wi-Fi people died there.
replied 2801d
I pretty much know. This would have been widely known if it was proven. Old people in retirement homes occasionally dying is normal.
replied 2801d
I just think that it is funny to see people getting some new experience, diet, vitamin, tech, experience some change in health, and then link the together without question or testing.
replied 2801d
So I should say right now that I am joking about the old peoples homes and hospitals, there is no data that I have seen suggesting that there is any link between mortality and Wi-Fi.
replied 2801d
But this one old person was just 98 years young, and it was just a couple months between the wifi coming on and the person dying.
replied 2807d
People smoke regardless of the risks. The same is true of eating meat. Even if the cherrypicked studies were true that meat was bad for you. People would still do it.
2
1,000
replied 2807d
Some people smoke some cigarettes but most have stopped smoking. Watch back 50 years when smoking was still cool. Same thing happens to meat & milk. #veganism is growing exponentially.
3
1,000
replied 2807d
Veganism is a cult and it's bad for the planet.
CryptoAnarchist
replied 2806d
I'm fine with vegans - more meat for me!
2
1,000
replied 2801d
Hey! Lay of the meat, don't eat it. I want it for myself:P
replied 2807d
The mainstream media says the same about #bitcoin because they want to sell banking products. They also spread false information about #veganism because they want to sell animals.
1
replied 2807d
Vegans and their endless rants are the reason why I have no wish to become one. I also love good quality beef, lamb, wild bore and venison and so on. Yummy stuff. Damn, I am hungry now
1
anarchovegan
replied 2791d
I agree. That's why I hate math.
Teachers giving the lectures about the importance of math and blah blah blah. Well let me tell you. Math is dumb. I mean, look at these teachers.
replied 2791d
I guess severe lack of protein and other good stuff we get from meat causes you come up with something as idiotic as this. Go have a steak. Grass feed, free range - Wagyu beef. Yummy
anarchovegan
replied 2791d
I guess severe excess of protein causes you to be blind to the idiocy of the math argument is the same argument you made about vegans.
anarchovegan
replied 2801d
That's an understandable reaction, especially with how poorly many vegans communicate the message of veganism.
anarchovegan
replied 2791d
The Militant Vegan Agenda
https://memo.cash/post/bde170eb80d3588b939699dc862873fc5f4b70061e3c95ea3d02faae0eba0f82
anarchovegan
replied 2801d
I've been looking at this myself.
Veganism: reduce suffering as much as possible.
Militant veganism: STOP HURTING THE ANIMALS AT ANY COST.
I consider militant veganism a cult.
Mons7er
replied 2807d
Yes, but you notice the adverse effects of smoking quickly. Dryness and irritation, etc.
replied 2807d
Except there is nothing bad about eating meat. It is mostly a myth supported by cherry picked data.
replied 2801d
If people think that eating meat is bad for them, then they will fee bad about eating meat. Which makes them eat more meat to fill that dark hole they have in their soul. (Joking).
1
666
replied 2801d
Eating meat is not bad for you. This smells like google trolls.
replied 2801d
Google Troll Meat is pretty healthy though.
replied 2807d
Some animals might eat you. Others, probably not. But that's beside the point. People have moral agency and are (ideally) civilized/non-aggressive. Animals don't have these qualities.
replied 2807d
A cow licked me once. Now my hair sticks up.
1
replied 2807d
Pham, you should take a trip to Sub Sahara Africa. Moral agency. LOL. Lets talk when you get back. Hold on, are they even humans? Lets see what DNA says
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
Thus, there is no moral obligations toward them.
replied 2807d
You may of course use force defensively against individual animals that attack you, but not against all the animals that leave you alone.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
I will not use force against animals that leave me alone unless it is to satisfy my hunger.
replied 2806d
You don't need to eat animals to satisfy your hunger. You might need to satisfy a habit, perhaps, but habits can and should be changed when it becomes known that they are destructive.
1
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2806d
Eating plants also destroys them so the argument don't really stand. Humans are meant to eat meat just as the same wolves are meant doing so.
1
replied 2806d
Plants are not sentient. What do you mean by "meant"?
replied 2801d
Not that we know of now, but that can change in the future, plats may be sentient (I do not think so personally) but I am open for the possibility.
replied 2801d
Sure, but we can only work within known science. All sorts of things that we haven't figured out yet can potentially be true, but taking such unknowns into account would be irrational.
replied 2801d
We need to take the fact that we do not know into account at least. Just as it was not uncommon to view animals as non-sentient for sure in the past. We have no way of actually ->
replied 2801d
-> measuring sentience, but we infer the likelihood from comparing the biology of humans and animals. But yeah, we have no clue about how consciousness works.
replied 2801d
We can acknowledge the fact that we don't know everything, but we can't act based on things we don't know. Science or even doing anything rational would be impossible under such logic.
replied 2801d
Science is a method that works great in some fields of life, but what gets funded, prioritized and is used as argumentation in human affairs are also subject to politics and economics.
replied 2801d
Science isn't perfect, I agree.
replied 2801d
The great thing with science (Scientific Method) over time is that it can only get better results over time, the special part is that it updates and discards mistakes systematically.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2806d
I mean biologically aligned. I am a biological machine that can process meat to survive, just as wolves.
replied 2806d
You can, sort of, but you'll survive longer on plants.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2806d
I agree but not because of the meat itself but because of all the chemical crap they put in it.
replied 2806d
No, it's the meat itself too.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2806d
Well this is yet to be proven which would be very a hard thing to. Either positively and negatively.
replied 2805d
replied 2805d
I try not to believe everything Google says. After all, it is a marketing company.
2
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2805d
Yeah and they are recycling themselves in the propaganda businesses.
1
555
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2805d
The removed "Don't be Evil" and leaked horryfying "Google Ledger". Just a bunch of globalists
replied 2805d
Dr. Greger doesn't work for Google. He has his own project at nutritionfacts.org.
replied 2805d
I have no idea who he works for. The point is that is a google logo on the video right?
replied 2805d
Who cares what logo there is? The scientific data on nutrition and disease in the presentation is the point. Are you rejecting it because you don't like Google?
replied 2805d
You do know that google's main business is stealing your private data and selling at auction right?
2
3,600
replied 2805d
I don't give a fuck about Google in this context. Google is utterly irrelevant to this discussion. The topic is health, nutrition, plant based foods, veganism.
replied 2805d
I just don't trust google.
replied 2801d
You should hear their new motto: Don't distrust us (we are not evil).
replied 2801d
Actually, google is evil. As a Search Engine Optimization expert, I know that for FACT.
replied 2801d
They are the good kind of evil though.
replied 2801d
google is part of the deep state.
anarchovegan
replied 2807d
Are you measured by what you do with those in power, or those who are weak?
How we treat animals reflects on how we treat humans. Non-human animal abuse is the start of cannibalism.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
I treat animals the same way they would treat me. It's as simple as that.
3
Mons7er
replied 2807d
Many people forego eating animals because eating them supports the systems they abuse them in completely unnecessary ways. Animals would NOT abuse you. They may kill you and eat you...
1
replied 2807d
Sorry, but my cat abuses me every waking day.
3
replied 2807d
if you have cats, you deserve the abuse. #Fact: Only reason you are still alive is because cat(s) are to small. Yes, this is the only reason why your cat hasn't killed you by now.
replied 2801d
My cat would be fine with just beating me into submission over and over again.
replied 2801d
Seek help. You need it.
1
replied 2801d
I absolutely would in that situation, a poacher or something like that.
Mons7er
replied 2807d
Hahaha!

I am sure your cats abuse is almost as bad as the farms where we raise animals for slaughter.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2807d
Have you ever visited a farm? Most of them treat their animals very decently.
replied 2807d
Unless those farms are run by moslems. They rape their animals. #PoorGoats
1
546
replied 2801d
Compare: halal slaughter with captive bolt pistol on a video search. I know which one I would prefer.
replied 2807d
Then don't be a cheap fuck, buy free range & grass feed meat. Cost more but it also tastes better and wont give you cancer. Cancer is caused by injected growth hormones to cheap meat
Mons7er
replied 2806d
Gozira, so if I cannot afford the much more expensive meat, it's okay if I go without eating the meat that is unethically and abusively farmed?
replied 2806d
Yes
Mons7er
replied 2806d
So if I am vegan because I cannot afford to eat quality, ethically sourced, meat, than you support me?
replied 2806d
Support you how? Do you want a medal for eating grass? Go eat what ever you want. Don't tell me what to eat. If you force that shit on children and pets, you are a sick sadist.
replied 2801d
I like that no matter what I eat, you will not object;)
anarchovegan
replied 2801d
Interesting response.
Thank you for the reply.


About Privacy Terms Stats