Create account

Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2067d
Sk8eM dUb
If there are problems that crap out the mining process at 22mb then what is the urgency of 128mb? Especially since 32mb provides PayPal level transactions anyways.
2 / 20
replied 2067d
There are other uses than just PayPaling money.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2067d
That’s not the point. PayPal was only the transaction level comparison that I used in describing how much transactions BCH can currently handle at 32MB
4
546
replied 2067d
Of course this is the point. Uses other than tx take a lot more blockchain space.
1
replied 2067d
Because there are businesses out there that could use 1GB blocks at a hefty fee, and won't even start developing their apps.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2067d
If the system craps out at 22mb because of bottleneck issues then increasing to 128 doesn’t resolve that. Fix the bottleneck then increase to 128 in 6 months is logical & safe.
6
6,212
replied 2066d
Actually it would only be 4 months because the next upgrade would be March.
3
5,666
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2066d
Oh really? For some reason I thought the next upgrade was in May 2019 🤔
That’s even better then ☺️
1
replied 2067d
Businesses disagreeing with you at this Bangkok meet https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-btc-jesus-says-bitcoin-cash-bch-miner-meeting-coming-up-will-resolve-chain-splitting-issues/ &mp3
1
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2066d
How do you think those businesses will react when the blocks start crapping out anytime they reach 22mb? Bad experience=bad business. Issues need to be resolved while there is less tx.
3
666
replied 2066d
No such thing.
3
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2066d
32mb blocks faked by SV. The transactions weren’t broadcasted to network
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9vxsep/psa_bitcoin_sv_engaging_in_social_media/?st=JOBYS6Z9&sh=b41f90eb
2
1,000
replied 2066d
Valid questions in reddit comments that are never answered. Sounds like propaganda to me.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2066d
Lmao
And faked 32mb mined blocks don’t sound like propaganda? lolololol
Common
replied 2066d
No such thing. Gigablocks will be sent miner to miner flawlessly, timely.
replied 2067d
A little advice - you should propably do a little more research.
1
replied 2067d
I did, but I lost 16 hours of mp3's from that conference, can you find them?
replied 2067d
Take a look at this. This is ABC and BU dev meeting/discussion. No technobabble. Real stuff. https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9voqg1/not_sure_who_to_support_in_the_upcoming_fork/
2
replied 2066d
Is it relevant to my point:

Businesses voiced their need to see higher block sizes before starting years long software development on the BCH chain.
replied 2066d
Yes, and they will get that with ABC along with the neccesseary optimizations to achieve gigabyte blocks. SV offers no concrete info on how they will fix the bottlenecks.
3
666
replied 2066d
Ok so you have that info right in your link. Businesses need a clear pathway to higher blocksizes. 128Mb is kind of small but it may do for now. At least showing some progress.
1


About Privacy Terms Stats