Create account

replied 2270d
Staying creates the obligation. You may not understand the value of having been born in a stable nation, but that doesn't mean you didn't benefit from it.
replied 2269d
It’s voluntary because you can leave
replied 2269d
Taxes aren't voluntary. No one ever said they were. They are mandatory, you receive shit from the government that you didn't ask for and are expected to pay.
replied 2269d
In a way, it's like those homeless people that put something in your hand and demand that you pay them for it.
replied 2269d
Like those guys that randomly come up and wipe your windows without you asking at all, and then they bang on your car and scream at you when you don't pay them.
replied 2269d
exactly, love that comparison. like the homeless people who wash your window with a dirty rag then demand payment.
replied 2269d
I didn't ask for the war in Iraq, yet I'm still expected to pay for it. NASA? What if i don't want a space program? Still forced to pay.
replied 2269d
Do i at least get to DIRECTLY control how my stolen money is spent? No. I have to *elect* some motherfucker who decides for me.
replied 2269d
Your money is going to build a wall because Mexico isn't paying for it. LOL.
replied 2269d
But do i get to choose whether i pay for it? NOPE
replied 2269d
Because apparently informing ourselves when we make political decisions is too hard to do. We simply just have to trust it to people that are more "capable" than us to make decisions.
replied 2269d
In a world where anyone can vote, and inform themselves on political matters from the comfort of their home with a internet connected device paired with blockchain security to boot.
replied 2269d
But no guys, we can't have direct democracy! Tyranny of the majority!!! Like the majority doesn't get what the fuck they want anyway.
replied 2269d
Elected representation is so good that we got stuck with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as our only two choices!!! And we didn't even get to pick between the two, not really!
replied 2269d
lol - oops typed at the same time.🤦‍♀️
replied 2268d
Taxes are voluntary.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2268d
According to which government?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2268d
Starting to think this guy is just trolling and he doesn't actually believe a word he says. Posterity will throw him in with ED and LightRider.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2268d
What about (un)SilentSam? 😎
This place is such a good uncensorable & immutable microcosm of online opinion shaping and disinformation. It will make a great study someday ✍🏼
replied 2268d
Lol, I think ED and LightRider are for real (no offence, you 2. Weagree on lots). TrashPoster, however, is definitely just a master shit-poster.
anarchovegan
replied 2268d
You couldn't deduce that from the username? ;)
replied 2268d
You can always go live in the wilderness. No one is stopping you. That said the penalty for not paying taxes isn't the same everywhere. They dont jail you in Canada.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
You could always stop defending mass fraud (taxation).
No one is stopping you.
Why should those contending the fraud be the ones to go?
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
Yeah, I know what you mean.
I have guns pointed at me all day and that's totally what voluntary means. /s
replied 2252d
Except you dont. They will imprison you in the USA for not paying though I guess.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
And of you request, you are met with those guns aforementioned.
So yeah, I do. So do most others.
replied 2252d
It is harsh that the USA enforces taxes that hard, but the fact that the requirement is enforced does not lead to why you are not obligated to pay in the first place.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
What?
replied 2252d
It should be a simple concept. At a basic level we are obligated to be good to one another. The fact that we enforce laws people agree upon doesnt mean we are not obligated to be good.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
How is systematic theft being good to Anyone victim of such?
replied 2252d
Systematic theft isn't good. Systematic theft is people and companies not paying their taxes.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
How do you define taxation?
replied 2251d
Well not as theft for one. It is part of your contribution to the society you live in. It allows the system to run. You want the Google definition?
anarchovegan
replied 2251d
I'm asking for Your definition.
Is Google you?
replied 2251d
Well I gave you mine.
anarchovegan
replied 2251d
That taxation is part of your contribution to society?
replied 2251d
In a general way, yes.
replied 2268d
To be more specific one is obligated to pay for the services rendered. One can choose to leave the society that uses taxation, and no longer be obligated to pay.
replied 2269d
"You grew up knowing you were receiving those benefits, and would be asked go pay your share when you could. If you didn't make plans to leave hen you consented." - SILENTSAM
replied 2268d
Ah, anarco-capitalists. You should stop arguing that taxes are immoral because they're involuntary. How about arguing that their immoral because it's stealing.
replied 2268d
The conversation started with do people consent to taxes.
replied 2268d
I mean, involuntary is part of stealing. if stealing were voluntary it would be a transaction.
replied 2268d
"anarco-capitalists" LOL.
replied 2268d
Yes, and both can leave. Both may not think they can, but they can.
replied 2268d
By the same logic if you are held at gun point & asked for all your money, you can choose to not give it up at the risk of getting shot. That does not make giving it up voluntary.
replied 2268d
& having the “choice” to not give it up does not make the interaction an exchange instead of stealing.
replied 2268d
Even if the robber gives some of the money to charity or buys the victim a drink with the stolen money doesn’t change the fact that it was stolen.
replied 2268d
This all of course assumes you agree that money you earn from your own work belongs to you. You could try to argue all money earned/value created belongs to the group.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2268d
Can without repercussions?
replied 2268d
All actions have repercussions. Good, or bad. That said the repercussions of not paying taxes differs by country. He IRS arrests you and the CRA sends strongly worded letters.
replied 2269d
Staying isn't an action or a means of positive assent to some kind of obligation to be imposed on others.

I guess if a woman stays in a neighborhood she consents to being raped?
replied 2268d
In the case of taxation it is. It isn't nearly staying, or leaving. It is a matter of receiving the benefits everyone there pays into, while acting as if you dont have to contribute.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
Staying on earth (because pretty much everywhere is a tax farm now) validates being stolen from, because you benefitted from previous work not done explicitly for you?
replied 2252d
To a certain degree though, yes it does. Humans are social creatures, and we have put a lot of work into civilization. Humans expect other humans to contribute. We are social creatures
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
It does? Isn't systematic stealing ("contributing") an anti-social activity?
replied 2252d
The only theft is by those not paying their taxes while living off of the benefits of them. It is theft from the community. This leaves the society free to reject you.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
Doesn't monopolization prevent the ability to make alternatives to use instead, such as the roads? Health care?
Doesn't this decrease efficiency?
replied 2252d
Yes, and no. Healthcare is an example how? How is this related to the idea of taxation as theft though? Many different nations have different competing systems over time.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
Are you not familiar with the welfare state, Obamacare, and such?
Healthcare related to taxation.
replied 2252d
I am familiar with how it helps the system and reduces costs. It made things more efficient. That said Obamacare is a right wing healthcare system. Single payer would have been better.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
So, those who reject the idea of taxation based on its involuntary nature and speak out against it as a violation of consent, aren't being stolen from?
replied 2252d
No they are not. They are just being dramatic. Especially considering the untrue nature of the premises their argument stand on.
anarchovegan
replied 2252d
And how it is untrue that they are being stolen from?
replied 2252d
It is a trade that the people have agreed upon communally. Attempting to live there without paying taxes would be the only real theft. Leaving would be how you would avoid stealing.
replied 2252d
Not everywhere. There are lots of places one can go. Many still within national borders letting you still benefit a small amount for free. Lots of land outside of civilization.