It is a natural fit: archives (wishfully immutable) sourced from collaboratives. No doubt there will be many flaws, but I hope it beats relying on centralized censorships
Storing video, even resized and heavily compressed, is still to storage intensive to be done for archival purposes. That will likely change in the not-to-distant future. There is one-
Yes, the only thing for big items is a link pointer and even that probably fails the test of time. I was looking at IPFS for a usage and there too lie problems in wait.
Even if there was a service that offered to store/read infinite free, secure, immutable, searchable, universal accessible, fully anonymous and universal read/write it would be problems
The quality of the result and the degree of satisfaction are often independent of each other;P Making humans satisfied (even with magic perfect solutions) are mission impossible. I get
what you are saying. We try our best to make the best of it. That is the best anyone can hope for in any circumstance, they can know themselves to have given it their best shot.
in that the mechanism to discern truth from falsehood, the faked from the real, the real world influences even if ID and authenticity was guaranteed, goes without saying that -
there is no perfect system, and that there will always be competition and politics, no matter the technological implementation. But it is still a worth wile efforts, the problems will
publicly available archive of all television news clips related to 9/11, https://archive.org/details/911,it may become the norm in the future to have all public access clips archived.