Woman with more than one baby at a time // man with more than one wife at a time. Is this acceptable? Perhaps, for example, as an alternative to death, just as slavery is preferable to starvation and divorce to execution.
So, as confusing as it sounds, in regard to the night, the rules are not the same but parallel for male and female, as far as I can tell about OT. So, it's unequal, per se. No polyandry, as far as I can tell. (This is a serious question in certain areas of the globe, by the way.)
(Not uequal, per se. Equal in matching opposite parallel.). Will male and female vanish as meaningful concepts with the integration of robotics, etc? If the servant with ten minas gets control of genetic Mina (robotics control DNA), will male and female of the night matter or be meaningful? Remember: women could receive inheritances in certain situations. An argument could be made, I think, that - in regard to the day - all distinguishing roles are circumstantial.
In regard to the day, that is. Nonsexual reproduction. The economy and military. Not with the night. If humans are still having sex with each other, distinguishment of roles exist.
I get enemies with both answers, and I would like to do a detailed study before saying this more confidently. In matters of sexual, the sexes have different roles; in the nonsexual, no.
Now, if you have to say, "Treated sexes the same," be careful: that sexes still exist may indicate that they are not irrelevant. Pushing for equality of sexes in the day may be misguided if the night is still with us. We think of night (back of our mind is seventh chakra, right? Head not on our shoilders is the back burner) we think of that even during day. When robotics (if they ever do) take over that, then why would we think of it? But we still think of it now.
Pushing for equality of sexes in economics may be counterproductive now, and there may not be sexes at all when it makes sense.
These klans people tick me off with their half baked flippant blood thirst.
You can't please them in part because they have no idea what they even mean by anything.
Ask a thousand preachers. Will you get a better answer? No. Why are you trying to kill me?
What answer do expect? This is about math unto life. Pattern that works. Something wildly different anticipated?
EFFECTS of night on day, even if night itself is not on mind. Men older in marriage relationships (since develop sexually later); since children are expensive, men are encouraged to compensate financially; more life experience, more money --> leadership in the family --> leadership in multi family settings
Now, if reproduction happened from robots and algorithms, all of this might vanish entirely, assuming that sexes vanish entirely. That's why hypothetical, of course. Not rashly bsquelchng naturally occurring gender distinctions in the day. Yay for China
A lot of benefit to China from bride prices, I suspect.. Motivates economically toward constant improvement.
Thank God for China! A serious discussion is so much more awkward without their example.
(Haha, not just a matter of mind, haha, no, there's no hope for that approach. I think my blonde boss might have teased me a bit at work about this. No, don't worry about my mind, but the night is with us in the day, and I think that that's the circumstance. Slap myself, errg)
Interesting stuff, a question though did you make the multiple posts because it's on BCH and not BSV?
I apologize for how cluttered this is, sir. I respect this space and its role in the future economy and society, and I understand that Memo might not be just a test social network. Of course, the blockchain is not.
It's on BSV, I do believe. Memo might be a test product. But some important things are on the blockchain, now (not all posts are rambling).
Just thinking. I do have large posts enabled.
Just wondering because it was all broken up into segments.
When I write a post it says 65,000 characters. So quite sure it's on SV.
Anyway. Have you traveled to China before? It's quite a sight to see.
