you have evidence to support the idea we're making progress against useless laws we've "consented" to?
Your question pre-supposes that you believe you are subject to these laws you against which you believe progress needs to be made, yet you put "consented" in quotes. Well, which is it?
u get a ticket, go to court, get it removed. You’re back where you started. u can get another ticket for the same thing. You haven’t made progress against a law you dont consent to
Why do you make those assumptions if you haven't tested it out?
why don't you provide data if you have tested it out?
are you not back where you started?
Being subject to a law and consenting to it are different. I can be subject to sex against my will and not consent to it, as in the case of rape.
Rape is not a law
so you're saying being subject to a law is the same thing as consenting to it
Depends which kind of law we're talking about. A natural law like mortality? We're subject whether we consent or not, though that hasn't stopped countless ppl from trying to overcome
have we been talking about natural laws? do you have a point you'd like to make or do you just want to keep dancing around critiquing details of my posts while ignoring the substance?
If that is what you think I've been doing, then no.
what have you been doing?
It's called conversation. Don't take it personally.
r/iamverysmart
