Problem is that they're "fixing" bottlenecks that don't exist and ignoring ones that DO exist. Like the damn blocksize limit itself.
I would encourage you to do more research. All due respect. What your saying is simply false. I just posted a Q&A video with Bitcoin ABC that should clear up a lot of your confusion.
When someone says "we can't increase the blocksize because mining will become too centralized" I start heaving in convulsions and breaking out in hives.
No one said that. The 128mb blocksize increase was already said by ABC to be in the plan for the May upgrade in 2019.
First fix the 22mb bottleneck then upgrade to 128mb.
DSV and CTOR have nothing to do with that 22mb bottleneck. CTOR s all about preventing large pools from doing slow block and garbage block attacks because they might get to 51%.
The way your talking confirms that you didn’t watch the video I referred you to. Please DYOR because you seem to have been misguided somewhere along the line
I'm only going off what I've previously heard Aumary and J Toomin say. If the narrative has changed in your video tat would also be suspicious.
The video is 2 months old and the most recent CoinSpice debate is a couple weeks old. Neither are saying what you have been describing.
So this is no longer true because it's two weeks old?
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️ Omg 😒😒😒😒
in crypto 2 weeks old is same as 2 years old in real life.
in a hashwar 2 weeks old is same as 2 centuries ago, perhaps longer.
I'm going to watch it but I'd like to point out that all the boogeymen that ABC warns about are not transaction bottlenecks, they're all just possible mining centralization issues.
During the entire video there was no talk of the so called “boogie men” and ABC never once mentioned anything about mining centralization issues.
