Create account

replied 2361d
Sounds like you're stretching a bit to include property as part of a person's "being", whatever that means, just so you can ban violence and theft under one principle.
2
replied 2357d
"...property as part of a person's "being", whatever that means..." informs me to find some way to describe this more fully.
replied 2361d
I'd say it's the other way around: if your body is your property all you need are property rights: don't hit my face, don't hit my car.


About Privacy Terms Stats