Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2173d
Fnuller15
Not sure. The Meses ppl would say that British common law would handle it. Right now drug companies have very few consequences for hurting someone with a vaccine.
replied 2173d
People are not really harmed by vaccines outside the rare allergic reaction.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2173d
I've heard of a problem with babies getting a high fever that causes brain damage and stunted immune system. Could be FUD but I don't see the motive. Imo the're mostly just pointless.
replied 2172d
More han likely FUD. I dont get the motive, but there is FUD against vaccines. They really are the most effective, and cheapest way to fight the spread of many diseases.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2172d
If you want to sell something, get really good at technical analysis and assessing sentiment, release PR when the trend reverses, then claim your product's influence was the reason.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2172d
I'm not sure that's been qualified either. The trends match but it might've just been good timing on the part of the marketers. I think news affecting markets is largely a myth.
replied 2173d
Well why is that? If you negligently harm someone that should be a criminal offense. If there're laws that prevent you from being prosecuted, then *that* is the issue, not the concept.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2172d
Yup, that's the problem with limited liability corporations. Plausible deniability/guilt distributed over layers of bureaucracy. It's definitely one of the toughest problems we face.