Create account

replied 2292d
TrashPosterInTheDark
Experts have difference of opinion on stuff they are trying to figure out. They do not have a difference of opinion on older well known issues.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2291d
Science is about questioning everything you think your know. If you don't, you don't do science.
replied 2291d
I understand science. You are oversimolifying things. I do questions the issues. That is why I know climate change is real. I spent a long time thinking it wasn't.
replied 2291d
#1 Everything changes #2 Climate may be warming now
But then food for thought. Is it really good or bad that the Earth is warming up.
We've been conditioned: Climate change=bad
replied 2291d
The issue is the rate of change. We have seen times the climate changed this quickly before. Every time it happened we call a mass extinction event. Yes it is bad.
replied 2291d
It may be bad for the extinct, but it may be good for the new species.
For me, I like it a bit hotter, thank you.

Plus, did you know that the Earth has never been as green before?
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
Earth was much greener during the time of dinosaurs. And the atmosphere was also approx 3X more richer in CO2. Coincidence? I think not.
replied 2290d
And yes, you may be right(any link?) My data goes only about a million-10 million years back. Dinosaurs got extinct earlier than that.
replied 2290d
Exactly, because trees feed on CO2.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
Climate change is most probably real. The cause is highly debatable.
replied 2290d
The cause is the burning of fossil fuels. We can tell that the added CO2 in the atmosphere has lower C14. Because it is millions of years old and already all decayed to C12.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
Explain why most astronomers are actually saying it"s because of the sun being in a super phase? Why nobody let them talk in the news?
replied 2290d
That is actually denier propaganda. Astronomers actually debunked that it isn't caused by solar cycles since those cycles do not at all correlate to the changes in the climate.
replied 2290d
Typo of course. The solar cycles do not correlate to climate change at all. Looking at solar cycles disproves that they can be a cause.
replied 2291d
I think I lost track of who was the climate change denier and who was the evolution denier.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
"Proofs" shouldn't raise more questions than answers.
replied 2290d
They don't. Your just not the only person I have been discussing denier propaganda with.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
Being whatever NOT denier is being science denier. Science is about questioning all the time.When I look at the "proofs" of climate change and evolution I find them rather unconvincing
replied 2290d
Probably because you have not looked at all the info, or understand the science on the subject enough to evaluate the data. Science leads to the conclusion that both are true.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2290d
Conclusions about scientific fields that goes beyond the scale of human beings can never lead to conclusion with a high degree of certainty.
replied 2290d
What makes you think these simple things are beyond humans? They are not even leading edge fields.