I think I lost track of who was the climate change denier and who was the evolution denier.
Being whatever NOT denier is being science denier. Science is about questioning all the time.When I look at the "proofs" of climate change and evolution I find them rather unconvincing
Probably because you have not looked at all the info, or understand the science on the subject enough to evaluate the data. Science leads to the conclusion that both are true.
Conclusions about scientific fields that goes beyond the scale of human beings can never lead to conclusion with a high degree of certainty.
What makes you think these simple things are beyond humans? They are not even leading edge fields.
