accidentally made for months after their 51% attack failed, at an estimated cost of $1 million per day? What rational actor would then continue pumping out propaganda and holding
conferences for a "product" with literally zero technical merit or substance? And then file frivolous lawsuits against random people who are tangentially involved in an open source
project?
It makes zero sense unless you're talking about a state actor with very deep pockets, they literally don't care about throwing $200 million down a toilet.
And the effect on prices and confidence in the crypto space has been profound, one could argue they've achieved at least some success."
