On SV reorgs https://www.yours.org/content/on-forks--orphans-and-reorgs-0c0c39d3c79b
I'm "pro SV" but I really feel like SV is about watching something bad happens, and then find a way to say it's a good feature
Hi! Thanks for the link, I haven't been on yours in a while. It's actually cleaned itself up a bit since I last remember.
While I totally see what you mean (CSW being kicked off Twitter is actually good, Being delisted is actually good, etc), I do think reorgs being a feature is consistent with what BSV has been saying all along.
Consider the following. These are things BSV has been saying all along.
1. propagation and orphan blocks are not a problem - they incentivize miners to compete and invest in the network.
2. no double spends occurred () and only miners were affected.
3. we know from stress tests in the pre-hash war days that every mining pool had differential capacity to handle big blocks.
The alternative seems to be top-down blocksize maximums and small block subsidies.
