He's talking about storing the blockchain's data, not storing copious amounts of data on the blockchain
Why do you think that? If someone wants to store it for whatever reason then they can do it easily.
Oh shit, I thought you meant storing things on the blockchain. The blockchain itself will be easy to store.
Anybody that pay the fee can do that, but a blockchain is not the most efficient way to store data in a decentralized way. It's very secure, though.
Ah, I wasn't referring to storing data, but storing the blockchain.
I guess what I mean is we don't want a large scale blockchain memory service. Look at YouTube. They upload hours of video a minute. Better to leave it as is.
Maybe I worded it badly. I meant storing the blockchain itself, not storing shit on the blockchain.
Ah, yeah. Blockchain storage itself is okay. Mostly because blocks only get really bug with more use, which incentivizes running a node. So larger blocks can't cause centralisation.
It's always been the worst part of the Core argument against big blocks. They forget how many nodes would be spinning up as others shut down due to being costly.
