Create account

replied 2147d
"we"?

You must be oblivious to what's happening
power is being taken away from devs
who have to date not been responsible for staying true to the protocol.

Being handed back2 miners.
replied 2147d
not oblivious to that. but what does it have to do with SM as a theoretical threat? (again, not claiming it is a present danger).
replied 2147d
theoretical threat
what IS that?

Something that looks dangerous on paper

or in peoples' minds?
replied 2147d
dude, the math checks out. in some cases it is possible for miners to gain small advantages over others with less hashrate.
replied 2147d
it's like blocksize. do we need 1 GB blocks now? no, we couldn't fill them if we tried. but devs need to build a system that can handle that capacity in advance of demand. play to win.
replied 2147d
similary SM threat ought to be mitigated by design, well in advance of it becoming economically significant.
replied 2146d
Maybe it checks out *IF* bitcoin were a mesh network
it's not,
it's a small world.

And, *again* the SM hypothesis
has NOT BEEN TESTED IN THE REAL WORLD.
in an economic environment.
replied 2146d
*dude*