Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2182d
Capitalism is supposed to make things more efficient. This proposal seems a lot less efficient(and messy) than doing some sort of housing association.
replied 2181d
Also depends on how you define efficient. Using least amount of pipe? less efficient. ease of switching between competitors? More efficient.
replied 2181d
This is the ridiculous mindset of the capitalist. Market efficiency is the only thing they care about and it's going to get us all killed.
replied 2181d
nice to see you again LR ;) the resource based economy eschews efficiency?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2181d
Frank: capitalism is too efficient!
Also Frank: We're using up all the earths resources, we need a more efficient system!
replied 2181d
bingo 😜
replied 2181d
Not to mention, Socialism suddenly won't make our resource needs disappear.
replied 2181d
Unless we revert back to a less technological time, which Frank denies and claims people will live under a higher standard of living under Socialism, which requires more resources...
replied 2181d
Socialism sucks! My friend from Russia formerly known as Crimea is the greediest person I know. Why u ask? Because she had absolutely nothing growing up! Now she is like a hoarder
replied 2181d
At least we will be killed in the most cost-efficiently way possible, and capitalism will make sure that there is the absolute maximum amount of worker units (humans) to see it happen.
replied 2181d
It might be more or less efficient. But we currently have multiple companies making every product. people generally dont say it is inefficient.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2181d
All I'm arguing here is that anarchy has a max population density. As you squeeze more human/mile it gets cheaper to pay for some centralized services/give up some freedoms for others.
replied 2181d
quite likely & i'm saying the more competition (in everything) the better (lower prices higher quality). Applies to roles gov has traditionally taken (defense, courts, infrastructure).