Create account

replied 2004d
anarchovegan
Some services do not work by market dynamics. These services are best provided by a public entity. Military, law enforcement, fire protection of all levels, healthcare, sanitation, etc
anarchovegan
replied 2004d

A bunch of other good related ones too:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=spontaneous+order
replied 2004d
I watched the first video here. I think all their cases ignore the higher level of order at play in those cases. I like those cases thogh, and think the system should make use of them.
anarchovegan
replied 2004d
Too abstract to be able to reply to. Perhaps you'd be inclined to be more specific about what you mean.
replied 2004d
For example, the intersection without traffic lights works within a system of other traffic laws, and rules for right of way.
anarchovegan
replied 2004d
I'm sorry; I don't understand what you're saying.
Going back: "Some services do not work by market dynamics." Explain?
How does involuntary interaction work better than voluntary?
replied 2003d
Some systems work best when funded by q public entity. Military being an obvious example, healthcare as well. Healthcare doesnt follow supply and demand. You cant compete with life.
anarchovegan
replied 2001d
replied 2000d
By work best I mean work most efficiently in terms of cost benefit analysis.
anarchovegan
replied 1999d
Systematic theft is more efficient than voluntary interaction and trade?
Could you share with me your cost-benefit analysis system?
replied 2001d
Means, works in best interests of the majority of the people, which is good for society and its health in general, also works better for people that work in these public businesses
anarchovegan
replied 2001d
Based on what do you claim that, Ed?
How is systematic theft good for society?
replied 1995d
Systematic theft happens right there in Capitalism itself