Create account

replied 2204d
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
Businesses disagreeing with you at this Bangkok meet https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-btc-jesus-says-bitcoin-cash-bch-miner-meeting-coming-up-will-resolve-chain-splitting-issues/ &mp3
2 / 12 1
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2203d
How do you think those businesses will react when the blocks start crapping out anytime they reach 22mb? Bad experience=bad business. Issues need to be resolved while there is less tx.
3
666
replied 2203d
No such thing.
3
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2203d
32mb blocks faked by SV. The transactions weren’t broadcasted to network
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9vxsep/psa_bitcoin_sv_engaging_in_social_media/?st=JOBYS6Z9&sh=b41f90eb
2
1,000
replied 2203d
Valid questions in reddit comments that are never answered. Sounds like propaganda to me.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2202d
Lmao
And faked 32mb mined blocks don’t sound like propaganda? lolololol
Common
replied 2203d
No such thing. Gigablocks will be sent miner to miner flawlessly, timely.
replied 2203d
A little advice - you should propably do a little more research.
1
replied 2203d
I did, but I lost 16 hours of mp3's from that conference, can you find them?
replied 2203d
Take a look at this. This is ABC and BU dev meeting/discussion. No technobabble. Real stuff. https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9voqg1/not_sure_who_to_support_in_the_upcoming_fork/
2
replied 2203d
Is it relevant to my point:

Businesses voiced their need to see higher block sizes before starting years long software development on the BCH chain.
replied 2203d
Yes, and they will get that with ABC along with the neccesseary optimizations to achieve gigabyte blocks. SV offers no concrete info on how they will fix the bottlenecks.
3
666
replied 2203d
Ok so you have that info right in your link. Businesses need a clear pathway to higher blocksizes. 128Mb is kind of small but it may do for now. At least showing some progress.
1


About Privacy Terms Stats