And how is that not a simple function? Because it definitely is.
Not to mention youve moved goal posts “Evolution implies the creation of new codes and we are never witnessing that”. I showed experimental evidence of new codes being observed.
There's a difference between seeing a three letter word in your alphabet soup and a paragraph describing in detail how to make more alphabet soup.
even if those three letters allow you access to a new environment/niche? would be more efficient to only use three letters if three letters will do. why waste a paragraph?
I'm talking about your primordial RNA soup of course.
Think trashposter was complaining that only a few letters changed to allow the ecoli to live in high antibiotic environment.
oh ok, getting confused btw the ecoli & RNA. The self replicating RNA a paragraph which could make more soup. One of the simplest examples of something that could be considered alive.
Lol I know I tend to write paragraphs here. Not the most efficient. 🙃
I'm sorry if you can't find the distinction between simple code adjustements and complex interdependant new set of coding.
I wouldn't judge the magnitude of the change on the number of letters changed. should consider function.
