Mining based funding of BCH devs is critical to reduce reliance on funding from Nchain/CSW/Ayre. Nchain/coingeek will fight this proposal tooth and nail.
CSW came out as SN because it was part of his contract with nChain - he did NOT came out because he was doxd but because it was profitable for him to self-promote and advertise nChain!
How are his papers of no use to BCH? I agree with you on patents being enforced by the state and that is wrong. But I see it as a defensive move to retain the IP to the BCH Chain ONLY.
Reasonable if nchain is a "true" supporter of p2p cash. The difficulty is if there is a successful capture attempt of the BCH chain and a fork is needed. Which one will nchain support?
Is this Bad or Good? I'm really not sure @im_uname. As I understand it, the IP is free to use for any developers in the Bitcoin Cash blockchain. Does nChain have an endGame?
"Just like Microsoft's Limited Public License has a platform limitation for free usage, nChain's license limits free usage to the Bitcoin Cash blockchain." https://prn.to/2qBCqxM
It is not free for any developers on BCH. It is free for developers who ask and get permission - big difference. Actually read the damn license, not just PR release.
A topic is a category for posts. Anyone can create a topic by clicking on the ‘topics’ link (https://memo.cash/topics). You can then organise your posts into a relevant topic 👍
I think there is something to say for business model of devs having a stake by investing in BCH and growing value of their investment by improving value of the network.
Definitely something to be said for that, maybe more so for businesses that should be hiring the devs. (Miners mostly, for now.) It's a lot of risk to bank on price rise for income.