Create account

replied 2135d
Because the more you know Bitcoin, the more likely you are to dislike what ABC has done to Bitcoin. Memo users are more likely to know Bitcoin, thus more likely to disagree with ABC.
homopit
replied 2134d
The opposite, the more you understand Bitcoin, the more likely you are to like BCH!
replied 2134d
Absolutely. And more you realized how Roger and Jihan were false advertising. Absolute frauds disregarding whitepaper completely.
replied 2134d
I find the exact opposite to the be true.
replied 2135d
ABC has plenty of room for criticism and improvement. nchain and coingeek are quickly approaching blockstream status regardless of their intentions. We keep building on Bitcoin Cash.
replied 2135d
We know each other from the early days of memo and we know we aren't sock puppets. I see that ABC creates checkpoints and rents hash, while nChain is mining on the original protocol.
replied 2132d
Checkpoints have been in the clients since forever. More frequent checkpoints is a kludge I expect to be replaced. Rented hash who gives a fuck about that red herring....
replied 2132d
... original protocol is not a holy gift. I am sad because I think you have been bamboozled. I want you guys back on BCH where we can build permissionless p2p cash for the world.
replied 2132d
Bitcoin protocol seems to be a system that is finely tuned economically & legally; ABC is reckless with its changes. Just adding DSV has a good chance of making BCH a target of SEC.
replied 2131d
Using the realpolitik language that nchain already uses, this is immaterial. If it is possible, it is possible. As loudly proclaimed by nchain many times, it is already possible.
Hurensohn
replied 2132d
Crypto IS already target of SEC. It makes absolutely no sense to want to make the SEC happy. We are already in a war: goverment vs. crypto. If Crypto wins, gov will collapse
replied 2132d
it would be stupid to taunt the SEC; crypto wins when government adopts it & is forced to play by the same transparent Bitcoin rules as you do
replied 2131d
So you would be against adding privacy features to BCH because it would mean that governments would be able to use them as well, therefore not helping with transparency?
Tone Vays
replied 2132d
I get your point, but use Jujitsu, use their energy against them. Yield to their actions and flow that energy against itself. Let them be big and strong, use that against them.
homopit
replied 2132d
Why are you repeating this DSV FUD each day? You already know it's nonsense.
replied 2132d
gaslighting
replied 2132d
.. then there is the economic changes to the miners arising from DSV. Basically fucking with the fine-tuning of the system is a recipe for disaster.
replied 2132d
.. BCH has now set a precedent of tinkering with the fine-tuning, which means that it is going to continue & likely escalate in future-forks; imo not-freezing of protocol is a no-go
replied 2134d
one week before the hashwar started, nchain more than doubled their hash. Currently they are mining with less than half (1.3Ph/s), despite claiming they would exclusively mine for BSV.
Austin
replied 2134d
Calvin rented hash as well. Also SV is definitely not the original protocol. You've been fooled.
replied 2134d
Hey there Austin. Can you tell me what SV has changed? I don't mean minor code changes but changes in the economic incentive of Bitcoin. I would like to know your thoughts.