Kitties didn't prove the network couldn't scale, just that the network wasn't yet ready for that much traffic. The concept is exactly the same for BCH - its a matter of blockchain size
I know you probably read a tweet from CSW bashing ETH, combined with Ryans tweet yesterday about MoneyButton being a 2nd layer - it is, but not for smart contracts.
at the meetup I learned about opcodes SV will be (re)introducing OP_MUL, OP_LSHIFT, RSHIFT increase range of numbers increase capabilities 4 smart contracts. Will be interesting.
Craig just likes to make similar unfounded claims about Ethereum and BCH smart contract capabilities (though I suspect he knows better, and is seeking attention / pushing his agenda).
What are you even talking about? I see Bitcoin, the internet, and ice cream as accomplishments humanity should be proud of, but that doesn't make the random nonsense CSW says correct.
I agree that Bitcoin protocol itself is the best place for most basic financial contracts (like Satoshi first envisioned). However, the idea that the BCH protocol itself (without...
Unless you change the base protocol or go 2nd layer, Bitcoin (BCH) isn't going to touch Ethereum's smart contract functionality, efficiency, or incentive model.