Create account

2305d · Bitcoin Cash
Only negative is that ABC's socialist changes get activated....but these could be removed in the future and may be the price to pay to compete with BTC on a more even level. I prefer SV win
1 / 9 2
3,000
replied 2304d
What is it about ABCs proposed changes you find socialist? And why?
1
replied 2304d
If you read Toomim's post, its essentially an attempt to make mining more 'fair' by making block propagation part of the base code - this is essentially wealth redistribution
replied 2304d
No. It just moves the bar, since the optimization affects all miners equally. Noone gets more subsidized than others.
replied 2303d
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9p1zi8/call_for_questions_qa_with_the_bitcoin_sv/e81m4ch/ - apparently large miners take a hit according to ABC, they win less blocks
replied 2303d
But I still do not think it is worth splitting the chain over, if it comes to that.
replied 2302d
Agreed 100%. I don't think we will have a split. One side will capitulate and join the majority
replied 2303d
If that is true, it is subsidy, and I will agree with you.
replied 2304d
https://medium.com/@j_73307/block-propagation-data-from-bitcoin-cashs-stress-test-5b1d7d39a234 - abc dev on why CTOR is needed, also watch ryan charles last vid on dsv being a subsidy
replied 2304d
The argument regarding DSV being a subsidy on the other hand, I can understand.


About Privacy Terms Stats