I dont think there's any way to know if this is real for sure. The paper however has a lot of details on the birth of bitcoin, lending some credibility to author's claim.
I would rather believe Craig is Satoshi than this one is. At least Craig sounds more Satoshi-like. Though I won't believe anyone who doesn't prove it with a signed message.
What makes Craig sound like Satoshi?
He doesn't necessary sound like Satoshi, but his style of writing is closer to Satoshi's than this Duality paper.
yep, it's scronty, and scronty.
“...Hal, if you're up there mate, I hope you're doing well, you should know this excerpt is really called "Bitcoin, me, and Hal Finney". God speed. Save me a seat at the table ...”
Yeah this is straight propaganda
What?
Some small blocker(read - central banker) disinfo op.
I could not find anything thats propaganda in this text. More like a compilation of what’s publicly available from the early days.
I stopped reading about 1/3 through. The bit about Moore's law in the beginning is a small blocker talking point. Then he said PoW wont be necessary to sustain bitcoin. 100% disinfo.
