Create account

BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2210d
When you can predict, roughly, what data will be transferred every ten minutes it becomes easier to prepare for interception etc. Correct? As I said you'd have to use your imagination.
replied 2210d
consensus mechanism to prove their existence. Hence why all transactions are also sent totally encrypted in every block as well.
replied 2210d
totally unencrypted*
replied 2210d
No. Every node on the network already knows about every tx. The hash of the transactions does not serve to hide the txs or prevent them from interception. It is used ONLY as a....
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2210d
You say no but then don't prove it. Every node knows about each tx yes, but not the order they will be blocked. So... With CTO they will, and it is more susceptible to fuckery.
replied 2210d
knowing the order of txs in a block. That's not how the encryption is used, or even works. Txs are hashed ONLY as part of merkle tree, meaning they only matter for the past blocks.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2210d
It's got nothing to do with encryption, but everything to do with determinism. And deterministic systems are more susceptible to attack. This is a fact that you have refused to admit.
replied 2210d
The universe is deterministic. Bitcoin uses that determinism via of encryption and game theory to work. Read up and stop using buzzwords like you know what you're talking about.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2210d
Ok cool, so you won't prove that determinism is good for a system susceptible to attack. That's fine, I hope you control your own private keys ☮️
replied 2209d
be able to deterministic-ally calculate a priv key from a pub key. But tx order is not one of them.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2209d
You're just bleating on off on a tangent. You still haven't admitted that deterministic systems are easier to attack. CTO is another attack on the chain's protocol, like Segwit.
replied 2209d
No, I'm explaining to you why you are wrong. You just keep repeating yourself, unwilling or unable to address the points I've made.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2208d
The points you've made don't disprove my statement that random ordering of transactions in blocks makes the system safer so I have no need to. Also learn how to thread replies 👋🏼
replied 2209d
Determinism is necessary for literally any computer system. There are some parts of encryption (priv/pub keys) where we DON'T want determinism. For example, you shouldn't...
replied 2209d
Yep, the same private keys that are deterministic-ally generated by a pseudo-random computer program, and then deterministic-ally used to calculate a public key and address.
replied 2210d
I'm done arguing with you since you clearly have no idea what you're talking about lol.
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2210d
Mate you don't even know how to make a comment thread so... Sucks to be stupid, I guess although you're probably not. But whatever.
replied 2210d
No, you are showing a fundamental lack of understanding of the encryption behind bitcoin and the reason txs are hashed in the first place. There is no possible fuckery behind...
replied 2210d
A) verify hash matches the blocks txs B) So the hash can be used to calculate future blockheaders, therefore cryptgrphcly proving the block is built on a valid tx history(merkle tree)
replied 2210d
The entire point of hashing the transactions is so that someone who looks at all the transactions published in that block can easily can quickly: