Create account

replied 2457d
they only collect the top-level domain and then infer that you could have read all of it on the page, so you are legally responsible for having read it all.
replied 2456d
damn thats terrible. Govs a having the most difficult time trying to adapt ancient laws to modern/internet life. always over reaching and always ham-fisted.
replied 2456d
There is also some modern day linguistic acrobatics mixed in there, where there is no distinction between what is real and fiction, it all falls under material, so a person that has -
replied 2456d
X amount of criminal material, you do not know if it is actual or fictional, or if it fits an alternative definition that is not commonly understood by people. The intention behind it-
replied 2456d
- does not matter, the context does not matter, and in countries like Sweden even being an actual artist with an recognized art exhibition does not except you from committing artistic-
replied 2456d
- crimes. So far Dan Park (artist) has been jailed for six months and the gallery fined, because the art was not to the states liking, and they interpreted the art to be endorsement-
replied 2456d
- instead of critique/satire of racism. That is some short sighted shit, and it is indicative of a shift towards ways of thinking related to political correctness in the law.
replied 2455d
damn thanks, as usual gov also doesn't understand Streisand effect either. wouldn't have heard of him if he hadn't been arrested.
replied 2456d
(Last note: Even the Gallery got fined, looks like art galleries may want to err on the side of caution when they set up art galleries, don't want the art to change minds after all).