you obviously have, great :)
The test is open to all types 'attacks'
if they're not from pro BCH'ers they'll be from the anti's who probably won't publish unsuccessful attempts.
Ok, so pro-stress testers should publish their own double spend stats, if they choose to try double spend attempts. Someone on twitter (@mindstatex) was mentioning small probability...
...of a successful double spend. i wonder where that number is coming from and with a great many DS attempts, maybe the number can be confirmed or rejected.
new territory which will inevitably be explored, the statistics could put an end to the theories,
worth capturing for ammunition.
Where to start?
I have no idea.
All yours Sherry :)
I have no intention to test this. Someone? I bet though that all double spend attemps will be resolved, after 10 minutes or so, even with full blocks. So there.
Might have to add it to the list bets that are coming.
So there right back at you.
With tongue poked out for extra there-ness.
Alright I will put some $BCH on the bet. LMK if you come across any takers.
thinking more about this Sherry, this is actually a really good idea.
To get some statistics that prove the chances and cost of double spends.
hhmmm... you got me thinking :)
I'm also coming to the conclusion this whole double thread debate is another fix it scheme.
