You don't have to agree with #AlexJones to support his right to say it. The purge makes me even more eager for the world to use censorship resistant platforms like this one.
The ability to not agree with someone and still support their rights to say it seems to have become more rare over the recent years, hopefully it will make a comeback.
My concern mostly comes from talking with regular people, the more they come in contact with differing views the more they want to control and restrict them. Few support free speech.
I think you are right. In my country we brag about democracy and free speech. Reality is that we have no free speech and everyone knows that deep inside.
-the assassination attempt would be very bad if it was done to stop his freedom of expression, something they themselves punished him for a couple years earlier, hypocritical.
He criticized stuff related to Islam, someone (Maybe ISIS) tried to assassinate him. The state prosecuted him for hate speech, the silly thing was that Denmark remarked that the crime-
Most regular people I talk to want to put in legal restrictions on what they see as harmful or immoral speech, racism, sexism, anti-homosexual, even fictional works that think wrong.
This platform is built around the principle of no moderation, if someone wants to be in a moderated environment they should be able to, but it is always nice to have the option not to.
It is very rare to see communities without moderation, if memo.cash works out it will be a great example of it, the small cost per message and barrier of entry works as filters.
I think the best we can hope for is troll posters from BTC, but they are nowhere to be found, which is a shame, because it is always fun to see banter and disagreements in good spirit.
There is no thing in the middle. Either we moderate or not. Moderation results in dictatorship - it has until now. It has failed every time, we tried it.
Part of the problem is the barriers to entry and the size of a community, etiquette and norms (self governance) goes out the window once the size of any community becomes large enough.
what I told someone else irl. If you use gov bc you have gov power now it will be turned around later. That & market solutions (like moving to memo) are genuine & difficult to revert.
This is your cue to start telling whistleblowers and dissenting voices to get some Bitcoin and start writing books that can't be burnt right here on memo.cash!
We need memo + IPFS as soon as possible. And follow the example of @Tom and publish as many books/article on the BCH blockchain to make them practically unburnable
I certainly respect your right to use the permissionless blockchain but it seems like a competitor with a more efficient storage system might make you regret this decision one day :)
IPFS is cool tech, but I feel less confident it will be here in 10 years than I do about BCH. It's a decent solution for non-text media, though still depends on someone hosting it.
Exactly. This is an excellent use case. Just as important as money. Think about it, blockchain is giving is oor rights back. First sound money, now freedom of speech.
BitTorrent exists for more than a decade, and there is no doubt it will for another. WebTorrent is the next step. Don’t be confused with overhyped IPFS.
I have a solution: users who "like" a media content commit to store it locally and seed while online. The more likes any particular webtorrent post has, the longer it lives.
As users engage more they can commit to not only store the content they like, but that of those whom they follow, and so on, by specifying the social depth (limit is an archival node)
also, you can can be a webtorrent peer from your browser right away, while ipfs-js is undercooked. I cannot stop thinking about ipfs as overhyped undercooked copycat of bittorent.
what duplication? one hash -> one file anyway. also, ipfs is going to be integrated with filecoin, which I do not think is valuable in case of memo protocol.
That is true but it does not store files forever, only the files that are pinned will remain over time, the files stored on blockchain would be small but immutable and permanent.
The Blockchain is a poor means of storage. Is there a desire to store a file forever on the blockchain? With OP_Return you have a timestamp of the file so as to prove that it existed.
Words can be more powerful than even large sums of money. Worth of Martin Luther King Jr's speech? Worth of whistleblowers' data? Worth of censorship exposure?
I view Memo as a nice proof-of-concept, but long form / high volume storage will be better served by other blockchains or solutions long term, and then this tech will fade out. My 2c.
I actually tried the "multiple blockchains" strategy with data in mind. It introduces more attack vectors than just IPFS. It might work in some cases tho.
Maybe we need a way to incentive archival nodes. If eventually there's a lot of data, we could develop something like swarm nodes: parts of the blockchain stored in multiple nodes.
not all data must be stored on one single blockchain. "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." Why not long form hi def video content? because it'll get priced out one day.
Why memo (the protocol) is important is not due to storage but due to uncensorable communication and identity ownership. All OP_RETURN data can be pruned.
Because there isn't ownership in IPFS. The blockchain allows identity ownership. Also, all transactions are viewed the same as long as you pay, so communications (txs) aren't censored
I would love to have a service to upload small files (other than images/video) and send direct download links, but I realize that I am one of very few people that would do that.
We are sort of storing our comments (data) on the block chain forever now, so we are sort of making the case for storing stuff on the chain, see no reason we could not send small files
Doing so puts strain on other nodes (interfering with the cash aspect of BCH). You would force nodes to store arbitrary data forever with no remuneration.
File hashes works great to create proof of existence/notarization, example https://notary.bitcoin.com/ but most of the stuff done on the chain is because of censorship resistance.
There are people that want to store small files on the block chain, but mostly to make absolutely sure that the file stays up forever, but yeah it is a fringe sort of use case.
There is no better censorship resistant mechanism than this. To censor the data you literally have to kill the monetary system.The bigger BCH gets,the more censorship resistant becomes
i have one concern about new posts feed: now its pretty informative, but since posts will be longer, I will have to scroll much more to read different new posts.
I think just having the UI combine self-replies into a single post would be great. It has costs, so it's self limiting & shouldn't be abused. Kinda how SMS works.
The UI for writing posts could show you've jumped into another memo so you could try to slim it down if you want. That & simple compression & simple markdown would make it KILLER!
The inevitable CP could cause legal issues for any central memo.cash website. Need decentralized client that anyone can run at home from scratch BEFORE jpegs easily stored on-chain.
There's a grim problem in our future: CP and other vile images that are even harder to expunge from the blockchain than they are to unsee once they're burned into your eye sockets.
It is already possible to encode any file to the block chain(BC) cryptograffiti let people encode images, and it was never used for those purposes. Few places worse than BC to do that.
Since it transfers to Dust addresses it takes about 4 bytes to encode 1 byte of data, and the dust is locked away forever, so it is a bit wasteful compared to memo and other OP_Return.
Yes, because it encodes into one transaction with a lot of output dust addresses and it do not use OP_RETURN, it is possible to split files into multiple 50kb chunks.
With infinitely long messages it is possible to just paste the raw text of the file anyways, there would need to be some sort of decoder anyways built into a service like memo.cash.
That is what the dark web is for, makes no sense to blackmail someone on the block chain as it is publicly visible and it would already be out there forever.
Anything that is not possible to censor or redact has that feature, even our comments now, everyone can put out threats, blackmail if they want to in plain text.
It would be easier to just put the SHA256 hash of the file as proof of existence, it is already possible to write any data to the BlockChain or any other storage system online.
Actually working on something separate from comments - a fairly new use case. Think on-chain geocities / github pages. Which would include support for editing.