Create account

Mrpumperitis
replied 2051d
BitcoinHoarder
I bought a few sv around $70, sold them now for $170...and wont buy them again.
I just bought BCHABC at $320 and will be buying more :-)
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Nice work! BCHABC had flash crash to $220. I can’t fuck with that lol 😆
Mrpumperitis
replied 2051d
Yea a noob panic sold into very low buyside and pushed price low,low, feel sorry for him now.(if he then bought sv above $150, then he will be crying,holding bags of bsvcoin,not BCH)
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
No way lol. I took massive profits at $181 and bought BCHSV back at $156ish. I’m running the bullish flag breakout to $373.3 target.
Mrpumperitis
replied 2051d
The buy support is fake, this is why i got out
carful your not left holding the bags
Maybe one last push over $200, but then the sellside will be higher than buyside
good luck bro :-)
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Let’s make a bet? I bet you 100 million Satoshi on BCHSV crushing BCHABC to $0 after the fork! I’ll give you the memo tip.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Acrually, I have 95 BCHSV I can make this fun. I bet you 1 BCH post hashwar that BCHABC goes to $0
replied 2051d
That's assuming there will be a chainsplit at all. Frankly I'm getting my funds out of BCH until the fork is over. Then I'll pick a side based on merit and price.
replied 2051d
Smart. That’s what I did too.. bch too risky atm, and even if sv wins , he has antagonised a lot of people. Not nice..
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
I guess there will be no split technically because ABC will not exist I put my BCH in paper wallets though. No hot wallet BCH except here.
replied 2051d
There is still the aftermath to be concerned with. Mining pools, web sites etc. planning to support ABC will have to adjust to SV should ABC not be able to survive.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Correct. They will learn that hashpower rules (not developers). Luckily, BCH is still young and investors are salivating over it (increasing in price in crypto bear market).
1DFZPecWiDxtkhQv
replied 2051d
With SV, the developers are the miners. They run the biggest mining pools. If they say SV wants to give control to miners they are saying SV wants to give control to CSW/nChain/Calvin.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Why is my name never including among the miners while I am mining on SVpool too alludes me.
replied 2051d
because that wouldn't fit the narrative :)
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2051d
Hopefully after they "gain control" they'll encourage healthy competition between pools. With a real bull market and increasing institutional adoption mining will get very competitive
cbeastsv
replied 2051d
They won't have a choice. Anyone can "gain control" if they are competitive enough.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2051d
Bingo! "Gain control" is a phrase used to frighten and(ironically) control you. The only way C&C win after gaining majority hashrate is by making Bitcoin amazingly good money.
replied 2051d
Salivating? Euhm...after a short rally above $500, it is collapseing again - also against BTC. Down to 0.8 again.
replied 2051d
FIrst when the news broke that Coinbase and Binance went with ABC the price rose 40% in a day, now that SV looks like the hash winner the price is dropping like a rock.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
That’s ok, remember I’m a hoarder. I love hoarding me a bunch of BCH. So addictive!
replied 2051d
Maybe the Coinbase news was hogwash and therefore the price dropped. That's not what it says here. https://support.coinbase.com/customer/portal/articles/2959951
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
You’re looking at BCH. I’m looking at BCHSV futures
replied 2051d
Uh huh...$200 for and $300 for ABC. But yes, SV seems to gain some steam, however it has gain up to $500 at least in order to not have decreased value for BCH after fork.
replied 2051d
ABC will survive. Don't fall victim to CSW's empty threats.
replied 2051d
Blocksize was an acceptable adjustment. But both parties are making changes severe enough to warrant this degree of infighting.
replied 2051d
What bothers me more isn't CSW, but rather the fact that we are splitting Bitcoin again when it should remain a single, safety audited coin that operates with minimal change forever.
replied 2051d
Why do you think we are splitting? Who is not willing to even talk to the community, much less compromise on certain upgrades... It's CSW. He is a fucking psychopath.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2051d
Once this hashwar is done, we’ll take out BTC/Core next and to starve the altcoin market. Then only #1Bitcoin for life. Takes time
replied 2051d
Will Memo write to the BCH SV chain or the BCH ABC chain should there be a successful split?
replied 2051d
ABC will change PoW to either what monero or sia was using. Jihan needs to get use to that bricked units.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2051d
If they try to call it Bitcoin there's going to be hell to pay. What a fiasco.

Do we think Roger will say that he thinks the Bitcoin white paper doesn't work? What of Bitcoin.com?
Mrpumperitis
replied 2051d
lol, lets wait and see what happens, will bch split or not?
btw sv is bad for memo, with sv you need to pay at different times to keep your comments on the chain.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2051d
Can you elaborate on that? What do you mean “with sv you need to pay at different times to keep your comments on the chain”?
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2051d
If the miners are stingy, they'll drop the OP_RETURN unless you make good. If the miners are centralized, this is inevitable.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2051d
ELI5?
Sorry 😬
I genuinely try my best to learn everyday, it’s been 2 years now and I still feel like there is so much I don’t know
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2051d
Memo stores messages as an OP_RETURN value in the transaction. Miners are not required to retain this information. If one entity controls enough miners, they can charge you to keep it.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2051d
Ohhhhhh ok thank you so much for taking the time to teach me that ☺️ Appreciated
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2051d
At least, I think that was the implication...