Create account

replied 2330d
Bitcoin Faucet
Nope. Paid the one time network fee and got into the next block. Ez pz. After that it's smooth sailing with LN from there.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2330d
So now blockstream holds all your coin and you can never take it out.
You're probably the dumbest shill i've ever seen.
replied 2330d
Blockstream can't access my funds dumbass. Seriously. Download an Eclair wallet and quit shilling BCash.
En Fri Mand
replied 2328d
I tried this game: https://www.lightningspin.com/ with Eclair wallet, but I couldn't receive, what I won.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
1000 Min bet on LN? That seems high.
En Fri Mand
replied 2328d
Haha yes.
replied 2328d
You need a wallet that can generate a payment request for the website to send to. It's not rocket science.
En Fri Mand
replied 2328d
Do you know a wallet, you can recommend? I tried with Zap, but LND crashed on my pc, when I started it, and I haven't managed to get it running properly.
replied 2328d
There is plenty of people willing to help you figure out on r/Bitcoin and r/LightningNetwork
En Fri Mand
replied 2327d
Thank you. I will try that.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2330d
Actually don't bother responding im muting you now.
replied 2330d
BCash scamming pussy...
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2330d
okay smarty pants, what do you do if you have $5 in LN and the network fee is $10? How do you withdraw?
By the way did you know you can't reiceve funds on LN?
replied 2329d
are you going to waste your time talking with this one? just leave it alone in his stupidity.
En Fri Mand
replied 2328d
Actually there is this wallet: http://lightning-wallet.com/ where you can receive through LN. I didn't get it to work though - I don't know if I did something wrong.
replied 2328d
Reading through that link, my 1st impression as a "LN noob" is that LN is very risky and could lock away money for days.. makes me reluctant to even put in $20 to play around with it.
replied 2328d
Nobody can tell if they've done something wrong. That's the problem with LN.
replied 2330d
You don't. Spend the rest later.
TheIce
replied 2329d
How. The. Fuck. Are. You. Even. Using. This. Forum. Trollcunt
replied 2329d
Social Networks like this shouldn't exist on Bitcoin. Too expensive, too slow to actually stand the test of time. @Bitpico will rip this chain into pieces when he attacks central nodes
replied 2329d
Memo is recording on chain your stupidity forever. Watch out!
replied 2329d
This chain won't last forever. BCash will be dead within 2-3 months.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2329d
Yes according to Adam Back and salty George a year ago :D
replied 2327d
I can't tell if you are serious or not. enjoy using bch anyways
replied 2328d
>Social Networks like this shouldn't exist on Bitcoin

But it does, and you're using it. :)

>Too expensive, too slow

1sat per byte is the cheapest anywhere, and 0-conf is seconds :)
replied 2328d
stop, praising boku no bitpico, youre gayfriend only do is bragging about how deep he can get on a cucumber. youre name suits you very well, were out of funny animals so youre welcome.
TheIce
replied 2329d
Slow? Slow? Try sending your btc for the same fees you're paying for these chats and you'll be introduced to a whole new dimension of slow
replied 2329d
Bitcoin is fast when not used by spammers posting their cat gif links on the blockchain every few seconds.
Barricade
replied 2329d
Bitcoin is permissionless. Who are you to tell us what can we do with it?
replied 2329d
You can waste your money if you want. Doesn't mean it was ever a good idea. Satoshi never made BTC for small payments, which is why he knew sidechains were needed.
replied 2328d
Satoshi envisioned online, permissionless micropayments from the very first release. :)
replied 2328d
And then later he realized the need for sidechains to scale. Dumbass.
replied 2328d
Where did he say that?
replied 2328d
Once [Bitcoin] gets bootstrapped[...]you could effortlessly pay a few cents to a website as easily as dropping coins in a vending machine.

- Satoshi (RE: Bitcoin V0.1 Released)
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
Still waiting for HTTP Error Code 402 (Payment Required) to enter general usage.
replied 2328d
Difference between HTTP 402 and Bitcoin is that Bitcoin actually made progress in that area ;)
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
I would image the majority of these types of payments will be of the the mico-type. If a single chain is to become the default, it will need to be able to handle these transactions.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
Again, a fundamental misunderstanding: this time of my point. 402 says "use something to pay us", crypto is only one way to pay.
replied 2328d
402 is then obviously obsolete, since it has gained no traction, and crypto has.

I don't really understand where HTTP 402 comes into play when regarding crypto micropayments.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
They are complimentary technologies, not in competition.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
402 Errors are returned by a website when you need to make a payment for access. Access could be a snail-mailed OAuth token, but crypto now makes this feasible.That's why I'm waiting.
replied 2328d
Ahhh. 402 initiates payment, then crypto is used for that payment. Yeah, I see your point now. I guess BIP70 supercedes the HTTP402 in this case
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
402s been around for a long time, but "Reserved for future use": Already part of the HTTP protocol, and would just take BIP70 on top as a data format. BIP70 is new to me, will read up.
replied 2328d
I don't dispute that. Personally I will use what works reliably and securely, whichever becomes commonplace is fine by me, so long as crypto is the underlying asset used for payments
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2328d
Here's an example implementation combining the two (not mine, not tested): https://github.com/bumi/api-payments-example/blob/master/README.md
replied 2328d
[Bitcoin] could get started in a narrow niche like reward points, donation tokens, currency for a game or micropayments for adult sites.

- Satoshi Nakamoto (RE: Bitcoin V0.1 Released)
Barricade
replied 2328d
I know how the narrative follows: Bitcoin isn't designed for people who earn less than $2/day. BTW, memo posts are small payments.
replied 2328d
Bitcoin isn't for people who earn less than $2/day. Lightning Network, is. Maybe a Memo can be made with lightning. Who knows?
replied 2328d
>BTC isn't for people who earn less than $2/day

Fixed that for you.

Bitcoin is for everybody :)
replied 2328d
I can prove to you that Bitcoin is for everybody: https://imgur.com/a/1NGtpoG

That's you, my friend! :D
replied 2328d
LN isn't even ready for the average consumer making $100/day because the UX expectation is high but the delivery is less than satisfactory. Too much risk even for small txs.
TheIce
replied 2329d
I imagine that enforcing an unnecessary 1mb block limit would slow down a blockchain a LOT more than the occasional kitty cat. Have fun not being able to spend your "store of value"
replied 2329d
Slows down the blockchain, but at least it lasts. Sidechains are for small payments. End of story.
replied 2328d
>but at least it lasts

how does a 1MB limit on block size make a blockchain "last"? What exactly is the BTC chain enduring that a 1MB block size allows it to persevere?
replied 2328d
BCH is fast regardless because there's enough block space to fit all the "spammy cat gif links" + all of the txs people do currently + millions more :)

I'd like to see a tx w/ cat gif
replied 2329d
Bitcoin is fast when barely anybody is using it. But doesn't change the fact that even in slow times it's still more than 10x more expensive. You are clearly an idiot.
replied 2329d
Uh, you can still get 1 sat/byte tx's through on BTC.
replied 2329d
Prove it to me. Where's the BTC social media platform? LMAO Oh yeah it's Reddit. LMAO. You can lie, but you are just lying to yourself.
replied 2328d
I've already explained it to you. Social platforms shouldn't exist on blockchain. This bloat and spam will only make BCash die faster.
replied 2328d
That is your opinion, but so far 2775 think differently. And you are obviously here posting and helping with BCH transactions. So thanks.
replied 2330d
It's 2018, you should be switching to PayPal
replied 2330d
PayPal is centralized.