Create account

replied 2267d
What is it about ABCs proposed changes you find socialist? And why?
replied 2267d
If you read Toomim's post, its essentially an attempt to make mining more 'fair' by making block propagation part of the base code - this is essentially wealth redistribution
replied 2266d
No. It just moves the bar, since the optimization affects all miners equally. Noone gets more subsidized than others.
replied 2266d
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9p1zi8/call_for_questions_qa_with_the_bitcoin_sv/e81m4ch/ - apparently large miners take a hit according to ABC, they win less blocks
replied 2265d
But I still do not think it is worth splitting the chain over, if it comes to that.
replied 2265d
Agreed 100%. I don't think we will have a split. One side will capitulate and join the majority
replied 2265d
If that is true, it is subsidy, and I will agree with you.
replied 2267d
https://medium.com/@j_73307/block-propagation-data-from-bitcoin-cashs-stress-test-5b1d7d39a234 - abc dev on why CTOR is needed, also watch ryan charles last vid on dsv being a subsidy
replied 2266d
The argument regarding DSV being a subsidy on the other hand, I can understand.