They will be sticking with BU on Nov 15th. Why would people lose money? There is no good reason to switch to SV. It should be called CSWV.
As far as I know Roger hasn't said anything about which side he will support, any word on that?
At the Bangkok miner's meeting, it seemed obvious Roger is no fan of CSW and probably by extension, SV. I think Roger is No-Upgrade or ABC-Spec. But No-Upgrade has no traction so...
at that time, yes. he is speaking at the Coingeek conference next month still. i think he is being silent on purpose
He said he was very disappointed by CSW at the Bangkok miners meeting.
Well, Bitcoin.com runs Bitcoin Unlimited (at least for their mining pools). No announcement that they plan to change to another implementation.
Not yet anyway. BU supports ABC's changes but not SV's. his silence speaks volumes IMO...honestly it makes no sense to reveal which side he will mine given their ~8% hash
Really we will just have to wait and see, but Kyle guess is SV will be a minority protocol that will either make a minor fork, or be abandoned.
It is funny to see you extrapolate things in favour of SV.
